GNU bug report logs - #60305
Help with hideshow

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#60305: closed (Re: bug#60305: Help with hideshow)
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 17:59:03 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#60305: Help with hideshow

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 60305 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
60305: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=60305
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 60305-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 60305 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#60305: Help with hideshow
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 09:58:48 -0800

Oops, this some how got sent to debbugs, I’ll resend to emacs-devel.

> On Dec 25, 2022, at 1:40 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> 
>> From: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>
>> Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 01:24:44 -0800
>> 
>> On the separate note, I wonder if the hideshow support can go on the release branch.
> 
> It depends on what it will look like.  If the addition of that doesn't
> touch hideshow code used without tree-sitter, and if the tree-sitter
> support is opt-in, I think we can have it on the release branch -- if
> you manage to do this soon enough.  (I'm planning on a complete
> feature freeze on the release branch in a week or so.)

In that case, going on master is probably better. Hideshow isn’t that critical or game-changing.

Yuan

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>
To: Bug Report Emacs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Help with hideshow
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 01:24:44 -0800

Is anyone familiar with hideshow? I tried to add tree-sitter support for it but didn’t quite make it. 

I just generalized some defun functions so that one can define a “thing” with a regexp that matches node types. So now it should be relatively straightforward for each major mode to define a “block” thing, like they do for defun, and a hideshow-treesitter bridge can use treesit-thing-at-point, treesit-beginning-of-thing, etc, to support hideshow.

It would be great if someone familiar with hideshow would like to give it a try, or educate me how to set hs-special-modes-alist.

On the separate note, I wonder if the hideshow support can go on the release branch.

Thanks,
Yuan

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.