GNU bug report logs -
#60305
Help with hideshow
Previous Next
Reported by: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 09:25:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Sun, 25 Dec 2022 09:58:48 -0800
with message-id <6776FADF-9563-4D5C-95E3-50ABEEDB60C7 <at> gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#60305: Help with hideshow
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #60305,
regarding Help with hideshow
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
60305: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=60305
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Is anyone familiar with hideshow? I tried to add tree-sitter support for it but didn’t quite make it.
I just generalized some defun functions so that one can define a “thing” with a regexp that matches node types. So now it should be relatively straightforward for each major mode to define a “block” thing, like they do for defun, and a hideshow-treesitter bridge can use treesit-thing-at-point, treesit-beginning-of-thing, etc, to support hideshow.
It would be great if someone familiar with hideshow would like to give it a try, or educate me how to set hs-special-modes-alist.
On the separate note, I wonder if the hideshow support can go on the release branch.
Thanks,
Yuan
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Oops, this some how got sent to debbugs, I’ll resend to emacs-devel.
> On Dec 25, 2022, at 1:40 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> From: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>
>> Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 01:24:44 -0800
>>
>> On the separate note, I wonder if the hideshow support can go on the release branch.
>
> It depends on what it will look like. If the addition of that doesn't
> touch hideshow code used without tree-sitter, and if the tree-sitter
> support is opt-in, I think we can have it on the release branch -- if
> you manage to do this soon enough. (I'm planning on a complete
> feature freeze on the release branch in a week or so.)
In that case, going on master is probably better. Hideshow isn’t that critical or game-changing.
Yuan
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 146 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.