GNU bug report logs - #60167
30.0.50; [PATCH]: Fix wrong capture in typescript-ts-mode

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#60167: closed (30.0.50; [PATCH]: Fix wrong capture in
 typescript-ts-mode)
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2022 08:10:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Sun, 18 Dec 2022 00:08:59 -0800
with message-id <F0005B76-6781-4F67-960D-A65294809C7A <at> gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#60167: 30.0.50; [PATCH]: Fix wrong capture in  typescript-ts-mode
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #60167,
regarding 30.0.50; [PATCH]: Fix wrong capture in typescript-ts-mode
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
60167: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=60167
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Theodor Thornhill <theo <at> thornhill.no>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 30.0.50; [PATCH]: Fix wrong capture in typescript-ts-mode
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2022 20:15:17 +0100

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi there!

We've had a small regression after
fbf0d3b796ac1b891be35b642878a1fd412ee5ea, and this patch fixes that.
Yuan, want to apply after Josteins agrees on this fix?  There's an
example of the currently failing code in the commit message.  There's
also a small whitespace fix inside - I hope that's ok.

Thanks guys :-)

Theo

[0001-Fix-wrong-capture-in-typescript-ts-mode.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>
To: Theodor Thornhill <theo <at> thornhill.no>
Cc: 60167-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, jostein <at> secure.kjonigsen.net
Subject: Re: bug#60167: 30.0.50; [PATCH]: Fix wrong capture in 
 typescript-ts-mode
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2022 00:08:59 -0800

Theodor Thornhill <theo <at> thornhill.no> writes:

> On 18 December 2022 00:37:30 CET, Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>Theodor Thornhill <theo <at> thornhill.no> writes:
>>
>>> Hi there!
>>>
>>> We've had a small regression after
>>> fbf0d3b796ac1b891be35b642878a1fd412ee5ea, and this patch fixes that.
>>> Yuan, want to apply after Josteins agrees on this fix?  There's an
>>> example of the currently failing code in the commit message.  There's
>>> also a small whitespace fix inside - I hope that's ok.
>>>
>>> Thanks guys :-)
>>>
>>> Theo
>>
>>Cool, I’ll wait for Jostein’s opinion :-)
>>
>>Yuan
>
> He agreed :)
> Theo

Yeah I think I saw his message but it didn’t appear on debbugs for some
reason. Anyway, I applied the patch, thanks!

Yuan

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.