GNU bug report logs - #60078
30.0.50; Gnus: Can't remove groups of select methods that don't exist anymore

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net>
To: Jakub Ječmínek <kuba <at> kubajecminek.cz>
Cc: 60078 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Björn Bidar <bjorn.bidar <at> thaodan.de>
Subject: bug#60078: 30.0.50; Gnus: Can't remove groups of select methods that don't exist anymore
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 19:55:32 -0700

Jakub Ječmínek via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of
text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org> writes:

> "Eric Abrahamsen" <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net> writes:
>> [...]
>> Where does that leave us? I think there's no safe way to say "this
>> group's select method no longer exists", because in many cases the
>> presence of a sexp like (nnml "<directory>") is enough to count as
>> "exists".
>>
>> So I think "bogus" can only mean: "this group belongs to a server that
>> provides a `gnus-request-list' method, but when we request the list,
>> this group isn't in it".
>>
>> I think you're right that simply checking if a group is active shouldn't
>> mean anything, as there are plenty of reasons a group might not be
>> activated.
>>
>> WDYT?
>
> Your analysis is brilliant, thank you. So to summarize what bogus group
>  actually should be:
>
>  1. The server of the newsgroup provides `gnus-request-list' method
>  2. The server has been sucessfully opened
>  3. The group is not listed in the active file
>  4. We do not distinguish between native and secondary select methods
>  and foreign groups.
>
> Is it correct?

That's what I think, yes, though it would probably be a good idea to
float this on gnus.general and see if anyone has any opinions, I'll do
that in a bit.

> If we go back to Björn's bug report though, I still think that the
> "correct" way to remove groups without corresponding select method is to
> kill them (C-k) and then kill them again from the list of killed
> newsgroups. This is actually what `gnus-check-bogus-newsgroups' function
> does.

Yes, poor Björn didn't really get anything resolved -- I think in his
case the thing to do is just delete the groups.

Eric

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.