GNU bug report logs - #59693
29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly

Previous Next

Full log

Message #11 received at 59693 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 59693 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, miha <at> kamnitnik.top
Subject: Re: bug#59693: 29.0.50;
 treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in
 indirect buffer correctly
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 16:05:50 +0200

> Cc: 59693 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 02:17:14 -0800
> 
> Thanks! I forgot about indirect buffers... We’ll need to make sure to
> use the parsers in the original buffer when user edits the indirect
> buffer, or something like that. I need to look into how does indirect
> buffer works.

In the insdel.c hooks where you record changes to buffer text, you should
see if the buffer has a base_buffer, and if so, update any parsers of the
base buffer as well.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.