GNU bug report logs - #59602
29.0.50; csharp-mode should either be a package, or compat code could be removed

Previous Next

Full log

Message #16 received at 59602 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: jostein <at> kjonigsen.net
Cc: 59602 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, theo <at> thornhill.no, stefankangas <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#59602: 29.0.50; csharp-mode should either be a package, or
 compat code could be removed
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2022 08:04:07 +0200

> Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 21:58:35 +0100
> From: Jostein Kjønigsen <jostein <at> secure.kjonigsen.net>
> 
> While don't expect that providing for unlimited git-access out of the blue probably is how new major-modes
> are taken in, I'm also not sure what the "normal" procedure is in cases like this.

The "normal" procedure is to keep posting patches for review until you feel
you've been doing that long enough, and managed to get to the state where
your patches get only minor review comments, especially about coding and
documentation conventions.  Then request write access.

> Are there someone particular we are recommended to CC in our emails to make sure the patches get
> picked up efficiently? And what if it's not a registered "bug" yet, but just an improvement? Should we send it
> to emacs-devel instead?

It is always best to use report-emacs-bug for sending patches, even if it
isn't a bug.  debbugs is our issue tracker, not just bug tracker.
emacs-devel is for discussing ideas and asking questions (you can also post
diffs to better explain what you mean or if the question is about a
particular code).

TIA

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.