GNU bug report logs -
#59594
[PATCH] gnu: i2pd: update to 2.44
Previous Next
Reported by: Iska Magg <iskamagg <at> gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 04:11:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Merged with 59593
Done: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 59594 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 59594 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#59594
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sat, 26 Nov 2022 04:11:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Iska Magg <iskamagg <at> gmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
.
(Sat, 26 Nov 2022 04:11:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
this is my first patch, please tell if anything is wrong.
diff --git a/gnu/packages/i2p.scm b/gnu/packages/i2p.scm
index 2320250148..2e8c1d085d 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/i2p.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/i2p.scm
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ (define-module (gnu packages i2p)
(define-public i2pd
(package
(name "i2pd")
- (version "2.41.0")
+ (version "2.44.0")
(source
(origin
(method git-fetch)
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ (define-public i2pd
(commit version)))
(file-name (git-file-name name version))
(sha256
- (base32 "0kh03lb4m8fvlfvq06d4hgwmk43pk7yp7n7y36kb2vplhrjrn2kx"))))
+ (base32 "0fwaalfxqdahgvx5rfkvdmf6gl10w328a18ddhyn5kvpmp9x7fgl"))))
(build-system cmake-build-system)
(inputs
(list boost miniupnpc openssl zlib))
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#59594
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sat, 26 Nov 2022 14:17:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 59594 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Heya,
On Fri Nov 25, 2022 at 5:34 PM GMT, Iska Magg wrote:
> this is my first patch, please tell if anything is wrong.
It looks like this patch came from git diff? Please use these instructions
instead :)
<https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Submitting-Patches.html>
-- (
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#59594
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sat, 26 Nov 2022 15:24:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 59594 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
merge 59593 59594
thanks
Hi!
Iska Magg 写道:
> this is my first patch,
Thanks! ♥
> please tell if anything is wrong.
The diff itself looks good, although I haven't tested it.
Sending a ‘real’ patch like ( suggests will include the commit
message, missing here. That will make it easier for reviewers to
apply.
You seem to have sent this mail twice:
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/59593
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/59594
The commands at the top of this mail have merged the two bug
numbers into one.
Kind regards,
T G-R
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Merged 59593 59594.
Request was from
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sat, 26 Nov 2022 15:24:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#59594
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Tue, 06 Dec 2022 11:39:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #16 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Iska Magg <iskamagg <at> gmail.com> writes:
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/i2p.scm b/gnu/packages/i2p.scm
> index 2320250148..2e8c1d085d 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/i2p.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/i2p.scm
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ (define-module (gnu packages i2p)
> (define-public i2pd
> (package
> (name "i2pd")
> - (version "2.41.0")
> + (version "2.44.0")
> (source
> (origin
> (method git-fetch)
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ (define-public i2pd
> (commit version)))
> (file-name (git-file-name name version))
> (sha256
> - (base32 "0kh03lb4m8fvlfvq06d4hgwmk43pk7yp7n7y36kb2vplhrjrn2kx"))))
> + (base32 "0fwaalfxqdahgvx5rfkvdmf6gl10w328a18ddhyn5kvpmp9x7fgl"))))
> (build-system cmake-build-system)
> (inputs
> (list boost miniupnpc openssl zlib))
This looks good to me, I've added a changelog entry to the commit
message and pushed to master as
037687ccc81d59613a7c023a49793670d7087c71.
Thanks,
Chris
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Reply sent
to
Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Tue, 06 Dec 2022 11:39:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Iska Magg <iskamagg <at> gmail.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Tue, 06 Dec 2022 11:39:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Reply sent
to
Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Tue, 06 Dec 2022 11:39:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Iska Magg <iskamagg <at> gmail.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Tue, 06 Dec 2022 11:39:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 03 Jan 2023 12:24:15 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 171 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.