GNU bug report logs - #59548
[PATCH] Include the package name in package-vc--unpack's prompt

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#59548: closed ([PATCH] Include the package name in
 package-vc--unpack's prompt)
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 08:05:03 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2022 00:04:06 -0800
with message-id <CADwFkmmK7G5977+QLyOSKo6UwSV7NU0Ge7k4+Eitp25-JuEp3w <at> mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#59548: [PATCH] Include the package name in package-vc--unpack's prompt
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #59548,
regarding [PATCH] Include the package name in package-vc--unpack's prompt
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
59548: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=59548
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: daanturo <daanturo <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] Include the package name in package-vc--unpack's prompt
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 00:12:37 +0700

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Tags: patch


Make the prompt a bit more informative, as sometimes I am presented with

this question at startup without even knowing the cause.


-- 
Daanturo.

[0001-More-informant-prompt-for-package-vc-unpack.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
To: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
Cc: 59548-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, daanturo <daanturo <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#59548: [PATCH] Include the package name in
 package-vc--unpack's prompt
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 00:04:06 -0800

Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net> writes:

> Likewise, can you push the patch?

Thanks, I pushed it with this modified commit message:

    Show package name in package-vc--unpack prompt

    * lisp/emacs-lisp/package-vc.el (package-vc--unpack): Display the
    package name when asking whether to overwrite its previous
    checkout.  (Bug#59548)

I also tweaked the message to:

    Overwrite previous checkout for package `%s'?

See commit c7a7488c52.  Closing the bug.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.