GNU bug report logs - #59547
28.2; The bottom border is not displayed when setting the pixel height of a child frame smaller than 1 line

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
To: Yuwei Tian <fishtai0 <at> gmail.com>, 59547 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#59547: 28.2; The bottom border is not displayed when setting the pixel height of a child frame smaller than 1 line
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 11:27:17 +0100

> Start Emacs from 'Emacs -Q' and make a child frame with the following
> code:
>
> (let ((window-min-height 1)
>        (window-min-width 1))

The last line is problematic since 'window-safe-min-width' being 2
will override it.

>    (fit-frame-to-buffer my-child-frame)
>    (let ((window-min-height 0)
> (window-safe-min-height 0))
>      (set-frame-size my-child-frame
>      (frame-pixel-width my-child-frame)
>      (floor (* 0.5 (frame-pixel-height my-child-frame)))
>      t)))

This is overly complicated.

  (let ((window-min-height 0)
	(window-safe-min-height 0))
    (set-frame-size my-child-frame 50 8 t)))

suffices to show the problem here.  In either case, you do two things
which most people would classify as pilot errors.

- You bind 'window-safe-min-height' which is defined as a constant
  variable and according to the doc-string of 'defconst' "neither
  programs nor users should ever change the value".

- You temporarily bind 'window-min-height' around the 'set-frame-size'
  call which means that it may not affect future resize operations on
  'my-child-frame' or its windows.  In particular, it may not affect the
  frame size adjustment triggered by 'set-frame-size' itself if that
  happens asynchronously (not within the scope of 'set-frame-size').

> The bottom border of the child frame is not displayed. Try to resize the
> child frame again:
>
> (let ((window-min-height 0)
>        (window-safe-min-height 0))
>    (set-frame-size my-child-frame 50 8 t))
>
> And select other window, then the bottom border of the child frame appears.

Here clicking into the child frame with the mouse suffices to make the
bottom border appear.

> This behavior seems to be platform dependent, but it is indeed
> problematic. It also seems to have problems on Emacs 28, Linux/X11.

The immediate cause of the problem are these two lines in window.c's
resize_frame_windows code:

  new_pixel_size = max (horflag ? size : size - mini_height, unit);
  new_size = new_pixel_size / unit;

where unit is defined as

  int unit = horflag ? FRAME_COLUMN_WIDTH (f) : FRAME_LINE_HEIGHT (f);

As a consequence, 'compute_line_metrics' in xdisp.c will calculate

      max_y = WINDOW_BOX_HEIGHT_NO_MODE_LINE (it->w);

      if (row->y + row->height > max_y)
	row->visible_height -= row->y + row->height - max_y;

from the value of 'unit' above, the text is not clipped and whether you
see the lower border or the lower part of the buffer text reduces to the
question of who succeeds in drawing later into that area - the code
displaying the buffer text or the one filling the border rectangle.

If you replace these two lines with say

  new_pixel_size = max (horflag ? size : size - mini_height, 1);
  new_size = max (new_pixel_size / unit, unit);

you should get the bottom border immediately.  Whether applying such a
"fix" is safe, is a question I cannot answer though.  Here I'm living
happily with fixes for this and many related problems but have no hope
that they will ever see the light of master.

martin

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.