GNU bug report logs - #59489
gdm: Accessibility icon missing in log in screen

Previous Next

Full log

Message #42 received at 59489 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Dariqq <dariqq <at> posteo.net>, 57292 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 59489 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Vivien Kraus <vivien <at> planete-kraus.eu>,
 Raghav Gururajan <rg <at> raghavgururajan.name>
Subject: Re: bug#57292: [PATCH] WIP: gnu: propagate inputs for gdm and
 rework gdm-service-type.
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2024 22:06:47 -0500

Hello,

Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Am Montag, dem 05.02.2024 um 16:08 +0000 schrieb Dariqq:
>> 
>> On 04.02.24 20:26, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
>> 
>> > Yes, it seems Maxim and I have conflicting goals.  Maxim wants to
>> > avoid "abusing" gnome-shell-assets whereas I want to avoid
>> > propagation, as it pollutes profiles.  Perhaps Maxim and I can
>> > agree on how to interpret gnome-shell-assets, as IIUC even with
>> > packages that aren't "pure data" only the data portion of it ought
>> > to be relevant, no?
>> > 
>> > We should do so especially because the newly propagated variables
>> > are anyhow propagated by gnome-desktop-service, which could
>> > constitute weird behaviour all around.
>> > 
>> > Cheers
>> 
>> What would you think of the wrap-program solution which would avoid 
>> propagating pacakges?
>> 
>> I currently have something like
>> 
>> #+BEGIN_SRC scheme
>> (add-after 'install 'wrap-gdm
>>              (lambda* (#:key inputs outputs #:allow-other-keys)
>>                (wrap-program (string-append #$output "/bin/gdm")
>>                  `("XDG_DATA_DIRS" ":" prefix
>>                    #$(map (lambda (input)
>>                            (file-append (this-package-input input) 
>> "/share"))
>>                          '("at-spi2-core"
>>                            "dconf"
>>                            "gnome-control-center"))))))
>> #+END_SRC
>> 
>> Also this way the assets (adwaita and cantarell) should be kept in
>> the gdm-configuration as when I tested this I had a white box as a
>> cursor.
> That SGTM, but we do need a more descriptive phase name.  The question
> is whether we should inline the gnome-shell assets this way as well or
> not.

I have never attempted to customize gnome-shell.  If it can be
customized with custom themes, different fonts and what not, then I
think it makes sense to keep the user-choosable art assets as
gnome-shell-assets.

Otherwise, if it's not configurable and expects only a specific font,
specific icons, etc., then it seems it'd make sense that it finds them
out of the gate (wrapped from within a phase).

Could someone confirm whether GDM is configurable when it comes to icons
and fonts?

Thanks for working on it, Dariqq!

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.