GNU bug report logs -
#59476
Inconsistency in TeX input method: \ggg vs \Ll
Previous Next
Reported by: Michael Shulman <shulman <at> sandiego.edu>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 08:03:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: fixed
Fixed in version 29.1
Done: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #21 received at 59476 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
> Cc: shulman <at> sandiego.edu, 59476 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 16:52:03 +0100
>
> tags 59476 fixed
> close 59476 29.1
> quit
>
> >>>>> On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 16:19:56 +0200, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> said:
>
> >> Cc: 59476 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> >> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
> >> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 12:06:45 +0100
> >>
> >> (with-temp-buffer
> >> (activate-input-method "TeX") ;; the input method has to be triggered for `quail-package-alist' to be non-nil
> >> (let ((quail-current-package (assoc "TeX" quail-package-alist)))
> >> (quail-define-rules ((append . t))
> >> ("\\lll" ?⋘))))
> >>
> >> (I donʼt use the TeX input method, so I canʼt judge if doing that by
> >> default makes sense, although adding it as an alternative seems
> >> relatively harmless.)
>
> Eli> Would you please add it? TIA.
>
> Done
Thanks!
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 241 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.