GNU bug report logs - #59423
Invalid 'location' field generated in dovecot configuration

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Pierre Langlois <pierre.langlois <at> gmx.com>

Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 22:11:01 UTC

Severity: important

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Pierre Langlois <pierre.langlois <at> gmx.com>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, 59423 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Pierre Langlois <pierre.langlois <at> gmx.com>
Subject: bug#59423: Invalid 'location' field generated in dovecot configuration
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 20:19:59 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi,

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Pierre Langlois <pierre.langlois <at> gmx.com> skribis:
>>
>>> After updating the system, the dovecot service got confused and started
>>> moving around all mailboxes.  I looked up the configuration and noticed
>>> strange invalid syntax for the location field:
>>>
>>> location=#<<location> file: "path/to/config.scm" line: 297 column: 20>
>>>
>>>
>>> Because the # character is interpreted as a comment, dovecot doesn't
>>> crash and instead moves mailboxes around in weird ways I don't quite
>>> understand :-/.
>>
>> Ouch, sorry about that.
>
> That's a bad situation indeed, apologies for the breakage!

No worries! Bugs happen :-). It was confusing but I didn't lose any
data, dovecot moved folders to archives so all I had to do was rolling
guix back and move folders again.

>>> I did a `git bisect` with `guix time-machine` (this tool is invaluable)
>>> and found the issue started with this commit:
>>>
>>> commit 543d971ed2a1d9eb934af1f51930741d7cc4e7ef
>>> Author: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
>>> Date:   Fri Oct 28 17:06:16 2022 -0400
>>>     services: configuration: Re-order generated record fields.
>>
>> I believe this is now fixed.
>>
>> Maxim, can you confirm?
>
> Pierre, has it resolved on your side?  I don't use dovecot myself, and
> since it doesn't crash, I don't think the dovecot will be an indicator
> of resolution.

I'm afraid I'm still experiencing the issue, I'll follow-up on the other
thread.

Thanks,
Pierre
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 2 years and 167 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.