GNU bug report logs -
#5937
23.1.95; why saving empty abbrev tables
Previous Next
Reported by: Leo <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:24:02 UTC
Severity: minor
Fixed in version 24.1
Done: Leo <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #55 received at 5937 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>> You mean keep C-c C-c bound to edit-abbrevs-redefine, but change C-x C-s
>> to call write-abbrev-file? Sounds good (tho it'll have to call
>> edit-abbrevs-redefine before write-abbrev-file beforehand, of course).
>> Oh and by the way: the abbrev.el file should be (slowly) fixed to use
>> the "abbrev-" prefix for all functions and commands, so whenever you
>> introduce a new function/command/variable please use this prefix rather
>> than the previous style of <verb>-abbrev-<thing>.
> How about this patch?
> @@ -225,6 +227,7 @@
> abbrev-file-name)))
> (or (and file (> (length file) 0))
> (setq file abbrev-file-name))
> + (edit-abbrevs-redefine)
> (let ((coding-system-for-write 'utf-8))
> (with-temp-buffer
> (dolist (table
> @@ -247,7 +250,14 @@
> 'emacs-mule)))
> (goto-char (point-min))
> (insert (format ";;-*-coding: %s;-*-\n" coding-system-for-write))
> - (write-region nil nil file nil 0))))
> + (write-region nil nil file nil (and (not verbose) 0)))))
> +
> +(defun abbrev-save-buffer ()
> + "Save all user-level abbrev definitions in current buffer.
> +The file name to use is `abbrev-file-name'."
> + (interactive)
> + (write-abbrev-file abbrev-file-name t))
write-abbrev-file may be called from a non-"edit-abbrevs" buffer
(e.g. from save-some-buffer), so I think that calling
edit-abbrevs-redefine from it is problematic. Is there a particular
reason why you put the call to edit-abbrevs-redefine in
write-abbrev-file rather than in abbrev-save-buffer.
Stefan
This bug report was last modified 14 years and 117 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.