GNU bug report logs -
#58256
Possible mistake in recent `dired-do-flagged-delete' change
Previous Next
Reported by: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2022 18:43:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Fixed in version 29.1
Done: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
It seems like there might be a mistake in the `dired-do-flagged-delete'
of this commit:
commit 194d54a929a83fede75d618b104acd1b544feb10
Author: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman <at> gmx.net>
Date: Fri Jun 4 12:01:41 2021 +0200
Fix placement of point in Dired deletion operations
It seems like there is a `dolist' that will always run on the empty
list. Was perhaps the below the intended change?
If so, I wonder how this code would have worked without that `dolist' so
far, and if that line could just be removed instead?
diff --git a/lisp/dired.el b/lisp/dired.el
index b9e89292e2..358e815c88 100644
--- a/lisp/dired.el
+++ b/lisp/dired.el
@@ -3664,16 +3664,17 @@ dired-do-flagged-delete
case-fold-search markers)
(if (save-excursion (goto-char (point-min))
(re-search-forward regexp nil t))
- (dired-internal-do-deletions
- (nreverse
- ;; this can't move point since ARG is nil
- (dired-map-over-marks (cons (dired-get-filename)
- (let ((m (point-marker)))
- (push m markers)
- m))
- nil))
- nil t)
- (dolist (m markers) (set-marker m nil))
+ (progn
+ (dired-internal-do-deletions
+ (nreverse
+ ;; this can't move point since ARG is nil
+ (dired-map-over-marks (cons (dired-get-filename)
+ (let ((m (point-marker)))
+ (push m markers)
+ m))
+ nil))
+ nil t)
+ (dolist (m markers) (set-marker m nil)))
(or nomessage
(message "(No deletions requested)")))))
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 310 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.