GNU bug report logs - #58200
osc.el name conflict

Previous Next

Full log

Message #14 received at 58200 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel <at> gmail.com>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: 58200 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Matthias Meulien <orontee <at> gmail.com>,
 Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Subject: Re: bug#58200: osc.el name conflict
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 22:08:41 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

I think the file name in itself doesn't matter too much. But should we also
rename all symbols to have a matching prefix?

Sharing the osc- prefix is not as clean but I guess there's enough space in
it for the two packages...

On Fri, Sep 30, 2022, 21:57 Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> wrote:

> Matthias Meulien <orontee <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Sure.  And I can do the renaming, but what would be a good name?
> > What do you think of osc-sequences.el?
>
> Would ansi-osc.el be totally misleading?
>

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.