GNU bug report logs - #5813
remove __DJGPP__ version tests

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Dan Nicolaescu <dann <at> gnu.org>

Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:34:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#5813: marked as done (remove __DJGPP__ version tests)
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:38:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Thu, 01 Apr 2010 18:37:28 +0300
with message-id <8339zfxjyf.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#5813: remove __DJGPP__ version tests
has caused the GNU bug report #5813,
regarding remove __DJGPP__ version tests
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org
immediately.)


-- 
5813: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=5813
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Dan Nicolaescu <dann <at> gnu.org>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: remove __DJGPP__ version tests
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:33:03 -0400
Are the __DJGPP__ version tests still needed?
Can we assume __DJGPP__ >= 2 is true?

Any reason not to remove them?



[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Dan Nicolaescu <dann <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 5813-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#5813: remove __DJGPP__ version tests
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 18:37:28 +0300
> From: Dan Nicolaescu <dann <at> gnu.org>
> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:33:03 -0400
> 
> Are the __DJGPP__ version tests still needed?
> Can we assume __DJGPP__ >= 2 is true?
> 
> Any reason not to remove them?

Yes, it's time to forget about DJGPP < 2.  Thanks for pointing this
out.

I removed all the tests for __DJGPP__.  There are still 3 tests for
__DJGPP_MINOR__, but they are in MSDOS-specific files (dosfns.c and
msdos.c).  I also updated CPP-DEFINES accordingly.


This bug report was last modified 15 years and 114 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.