GNU bug report logs - #56846
[PATCH] FeatherNotes package

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: 宋文武 <iyzsong <at> envs.net>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#56846: closed ([PATCH] FeatherNotes package )
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 01:24:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Thu, 04 Aug 2022 09:23:20 +0800
with message-id <87edxw2453.fsf_-_ <at> envs.net>
and subject line Re: bug#56846: [PATCH] FeatherNotes package 
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #56846,
regarding [PATCH] FeatherNotes package 
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
56846: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=56846
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Pavel Shlyak <p.shlyak <at> pantherx.org>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] FeatherNotes package 
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2022 01:50:23 +0300

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello!

Here is my patch to add FeatherNotes package to guix. I upstream it from PantherX channel, hence 3 copyright lines.
I build it against Qt5 as Qt6 support in FeatherNotes is experimental and is not recommended for daily usage yet.

Thank you in advance for your feedback.
Have a nice day!

[0001-gnu-feathernotes-new-package.patch (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: 宋文武 <iyzsong <at> envs.net>
To: Pavel Shlyak <p.shlyak <at> pantherx.org>
Cc: 56846-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#56846: [PATCH] FeatherNotes package 
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 09:23:20 +0800

Pavel Shlyak <p.shlyak <at> pantherx.org> writes:

>> Maybe "notes manager" is better than "notes-manager"?
>
> I copied the this from the original README (https://github.com/tsujan/FeatherNotes/blob/master/README.md)
>
>> Why here are 2020 and 2021 changes?
>
> Because I upstream this package from another repo where it was packaged long time ago.
>
>> Seem missing a "," after "editable tables».
>
> Yes
>
>> When adding a new package, the "tradition" is:
>
> I would be happy if it was edited during merge.

Done, thank you!

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.