GNU bug report logs - #56505
[PATCHES] Mingw configuration for openssl

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Vivien Kraus <vivien <at> planete-kraus.eu>
Subject: bug#56505: closed (Re: bug#56505: [PATCHES] Mingw configuration
 for openssl)
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 22:15:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#56505: [PATCHES] Mingw configuration for openssl

which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 56505 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
56505: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=56505
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Vivien Kraus <vivien <at> planete-kraus.eu>
Cc: 56505-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#56505: [PATCHES] Mingw configuration for openssl
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2022 00:14:12 +0200

Hi Vivien,

Vivien Kraus <vivien <at> planete-kraus.eu> skribis:

> antipode on #guix told me that these archaic tests to determine the
> openssl target should be replaced with the new target predicates in
> (guix utils), and that the kernel and the architecture should be dealt
> with independently.

Good idea.

> However, it seems that mingw targets do not use the same scheme, so I
> had to keep that special case.
>
> I had to introduce a new predicate for mips64el. As far as I
> understand, this is also a 64-bit target, so it should also be detected
> by target-64bit?, but fortunately this is already the case, so I don’t
> have to change target-64bit?. I don’t think there are other predicates
> that I should change, but I may be wrong.
>
> What do you think?

I think that’s good!

> From 4084fb014e84e6b15825c6c37dcdba8bde56fa4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Vivien Kraus <vivien <at> planete-kraus.eu>
> Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2022 23:39:16 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] gnu: openssl: Cross-compile to mingw.
>
> * gnu/packages/tls.scm (target->openssl-target): Add cases for mingw and
> mingw64.

[...]

> From e4631751a4e435a2125b5d72f665f6ec0ef5d6e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Vivien Kraus <vivien <at> planete-kraus.eu>
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 20:05:45 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] guix: Add target-mips64el?.
>
> * guix/utils.scm (target-mips64el?): New function. It detects whether the
> target system is mips64el.

[...]

> From ae3bffd19c2887342e28372c3c613e998eb21840 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Vivien Kraus <vivien <at> planete-kraus.eu>
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 20:09:14 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] gnu: openssl: use target predicates from (guix utils)
>  for openssl.
>
> ---
>  gnu/packages/tls.scm | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

Added a commit log to this one and committed, thanks!

‘guix build openssl --target=x86_64-w64-mingw32’ works and the funny
part is that .dll files end up in bin/, but I think that’s intended on
Windows?

Ludo’.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Vivien Kraus <vivien <at> planete-kraus.eu>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCHES] Mingw configuration for openssl
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 01:55:37 +0200

[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]

Dear guix,

openssl can be cross-compiled to mingw, by adding a mingw entry in the
list of known openssl targets.

What do you think?

Best regards,

Vivien

[0001-gnu-openssl-Cross-compile-to-mingw.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.