GNU bug report logs - #56248
[PATCH 0/7] Remove use of older check-0.14 from most packages

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauermann <at> kolabnow.com>
Subject: bug#56248: closed (Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Remove use of older
 check-0.14 from most packages)
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2022 10:01:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#56248: [PATCH 0/7] Remove use of older check-0.14 from most packages

which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 56248 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
56248: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=56248
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
To: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauermann <at> kolabnow.com>, 56248-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Remove use of older check-0.14 from most packages
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2022 12:00:28 +0200

Am Samstag, dem 02.07.2022 um 01:07 -0300 schrieb Thiago Jung
Bauermann:
> Hello,
> 
> This version addresses Liliana's comments about the message title,
> body and changelog, by adopting her suggestions.
Pushed to master.

Thanks

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauermann <at> kolabnow.com>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauermann <at> kolabnow.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] Remove use of older check-0.14 from most packages
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 01:43:39 -0300

Hello,

Move packages that are currently using check-0.14 to regular check. Except
for libwapcaplet, which still needs the older version, all others build
fine with the newer one. I noticed this issue because check-0.14 doesn't
build on powerpc64le, and that prevented me from building recutils.

These patches can go on the master branch because according to “guix
refresh -l”, they have few dependents:

- recutils: A single dependent package: emacs-helm-system-packages <at> 1.10.2
- libsigrokdecode: Building the following 2 packages would ensure
  2 dependent packages are rebuilt: pulseview <at> 0.4.2 sigrok-cli <at> 0.7.2
- burp :: No dependents other than itself: burp <at> 2.3.38
- edi :: No dependents other than itself: edi <at> 0.8.0
- libsbml :: Building the following 1 package would ensure 2 dependent
  packages are rebuilt: r-biggr <at> 1.32.0
- iodine :: No dependents other than itself: iodine <at> 0.7.0
- gdm :: Building the following 4 packages would ensure 6 dependent
  packages are rebuilt: gnome-shell-extension-gsconnect <at> 48
  arc-theme <at> 20210412 numix-gtk-theme <at> 2.6.7 gnome <at> 41.0

To test this series, I built all the packages mentioned above on
x86_64-linux. I also built the following ones on powerpc64le-linux:

recutils, emacs-helm-system-packages, libsigrokdecode, sigrok-cli, burp,
libsbml, iodine.

The others don't currently build on powerpc64le-linux for other reasons.

Thiago Jung Bauermann (7):
  gnu: recutils: Use regular check version
  gnu: libsigrokdecode: Use regular check version
  gnu: burp: Use regular check version
  gnu: edi: Use regular check version
  gnu: libsbml: Use regular check version
  gnu: iodine: Use regular check version
  gnu: gdm: Use regular check version

 gnu/packages/backup.scm         | 2 +-
 gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm | 2 +-
 gnu/packages/databases.scm      | 2 +-
 gnu/packages/electronics.scm    | 2 +-
 gnu/packages/enlightenment.scm  | 2 +-
 gnu/packages/gnome.scm          | 2 +-
 gnu/packages/networking.scm     | 2 +-
 7 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)


base-commit: d86ad3d8dff0f6f3d63e52a9309fac9fe279c77a

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.