GNU bug report logs - #55869
[PATCH] Add support for the Lepcha script

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 14:31:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 55869 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#55869: [PATCH] Add support for the Lepcha script
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 13:00:23 +0300
> From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30 <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 15:01:44 +0530
> Cc: 55869-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> >Can you tell where did you take this name of the script (or is it >the language)?  Both Wikipedia and the
> Omniglot pages show >names that look differently and are written with different >codepoints.
> 
> I copied the name from the infobox in the Wikipedia page for the Lepcha script
> (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lepcha_script) it says "Rong" which is one of the native name of the script,
> one other name is "Rong Ring"  which is written in the image of the Wikipedia infobox and also in the
> omniglot website (https://omniglot.com/writing/lepcha.htm) both are correct.
> (Atleast according to these websites)

The question is: what should we use?  Maybe using what is actually
shown (as opposed to transliterated) is better?




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 344 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.