GNU bug report logs - #54882
[PATCH 0/2] gnu: Add hut.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Dhruvin Gandhi <contact <at> dhruvin.dev>

Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 12:11:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
To: Dhruvin Gandhi <contact <at> dhruvin.dev>, 54882 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#54882] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add hut.
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 17:43:16 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Dhruvin Gandhi schreef op di 12-04-2022 om 18:42 [+0530]:
> On Tue Apr 12, 2022 at 6:06 PM IST, Maxime Devos wrote:
> > Only one package per patch.  From (guix)Submitting Patches:
> > 
> >    13. Verify that your patch contains only one set of related changes.
> >       Bundling unrelated changes together makes reviewing harder and
> >       slower.
> > 
> >       Examples of unrelated changes include the addition of several
> >       packages, or a package update along with fixes to that package.
> Should I submit a patch for each dependency? Or do you mean I should
> send a separate patch for updating github.com/spf13/cobra?

A separate patch like for updating github.com/spf13/cobra.

> All newly added packages before hut's definition are required to build
> hut, so I put them together in one commit.

FWIW, a separate patch makes it easier to see at a glance which commit
modifies which packages.

Greetings,
Maxime.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 2 years and 318 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.