GNU bug report logs - #54723
'guix publish' without '--cache' can send garbled narinfo responses

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>

Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 10:16:02 UTC

Severity: important

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #8 received at 54723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
Cc: 54723 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#54723: [PATCH] Check URI when verifying narinfo validity.
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 19:08:12 +0200
Hi,

Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net> skribis:

> When trying to upgrade a machine using a substitute server on the same
> LAN, I get this crash a lot:
>
> # guix system reconfigure --substitute-urls="http://192.168.0.22:8080 https://ci.guix.gnu.org" /etc/guix/config.scm
> substitute: mise à jour des substituts depuis « http://192.168.0.22:8080 »... 100.0 %

[...]

> It looks like the 'narinfo-uri' field is an empty list instead of a list
> of URIs. Is that supposed to be possible?

I don’t think so.  Could you grab a narinfo and share it?

  wget -qO - http://192.168.0.22:8080/HASH.narinfo

where HASH is the hash part of a store item.

What could happen though is a situation where ‘guix publish’ only offers
a compression method not supported by the client.  In that case,
‘narinfo-best-uri’ throws a match-error because ‘choices’ is the empty
list.  We should fix that.

> Does the the attached patch adding a check for the validity of
> this field in the 'valid-narinfo?' function make sense?

Maybe, but I’d like to make sure we understand the issue.

Thanks,
Ludo’.




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 17 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.