GNU bug report logs -
#54722
28.1: colors in alacritty terminal
Previous Next
Reported by: Daniel Lublin <daniel <at> lublin.se>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 08:45:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 28.1
Done: Daniel Lublin <daniel <at> lublin.se>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 54722 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 54722 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#54722
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 05 Apr 2022 08:45:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Daniel Lublin <daniel <at> lublin.se>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Tue, 05 Apr 2022 08:45:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
I'm trying out emacs 28, coming from 27.2 on an Arch system. I have an issue
with the colors displayed when running in alacritty terminal. Running in
urxvt and xterm is fine.
I see different hues of most colors, and list-colors-display looks
completely different in alacritty vs urxvt. I'm attaching a screenshot of
what it looks like. On the left is alacritty, on the right urxvt. Running
emacs -nw -q --no-site-file -nsl
In #emacs on libera I was pointed at
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=48439 and I tried removing the
alacritty alias, but that didn't help.
My system has ncurses 6.3 which does have terminfo for alacritty.
--
Daniel
lublin.se
[1649146161.png (image/png, attachment)]
Reply sent
to
Daniel Lublin <daniel <at> lublin.se>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Sat, 09 Apr 2022 15:24:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Daniel Lublin <daniel <at> lublin.se>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Sat, 09 Apr 2022 15:24:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #10 received at 54722-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
I also filed this here: https://github.com/alacritty/alacritty/issues/5995
Since, I played around a bit more. Also tried gnome-terminal (which I never
really used), and emacs 28 in it looks identical to alacritty. I'm thinking
that emacs 28 and alacritty might actually be doing things correctly now,
and it was just broken before. urxvt and xterm might be flawed, or lack
features.
As kchibisov summed it up in the above report "Then it seems like it was
broken before and you've liked it, but now it's correct and you don't? So
you should update your emacs settings?". Yes, I think so.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sun, 08 May 2022 11:24:06 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 40 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.