GNU bug report logs - #53878
[PATCH 00/11] Update Racket to 8.4. Adjust Chez Scheme

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Philip McGrath <philip <at> philipmcgrath.com>

Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 15:14:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Merged with 53997

Done: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #129 received at 53878 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Philip McGrath <philip <at> philipmcgrath.com>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> ist.tugraz.at>,
 53878 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] gnu: chez-scheme: Explicitly package bootstrap
 bootfiles.
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 03:40:43 -0500
Hi,

On 2/17/22 03:19, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Am Donnerstag, dem 17.02.2022 um 03:06 -0500 schrieb Philip McGrath:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2/17/22 02:10, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> I was picturing something like
>>>
>>> (define chez-bootfiles (chez ...)
>>>     (package/inherit chez
>>>       (inputs ...)
>>>       (native-inputs ...)
>>>       (build-system ...)
>>>       (arguments ...)))
>>>
>>
>> Sorry, I still don't think I'm following. Would this rely on the
>> `mative-inputs` being thunked to let the result of this function be
>> an input to `chez-scheme`?
> Yes.
> 
>> What commonality is the function abstracting over, compared to having
>> 'chez-scheme-for-racket-bootstrap-bootfiles' inherit from 'chez-
>> scheme-bootstrap-bootfiles'?
> At the moment version, source, home-page and license.  I don't really
> think bootstrap files ought to be a part of chez' source, so if you
> wanted to do this really cleanly, you'd have to drop them from chez and
> add restrict chez-bootstrap to them, which would imply you'd have to
> use (version (package-version chez-scheme)) explicitly – for now I
> don't want to add too much burden to that patch and you can assume
> source to be the same between the two.
> 

Ok, this helps, I think. I'll give it a try.

In <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/47153#9> you argued---and convinced 
me---that we should keep the pre-built bootfiles in the origin until we 
actually don't need them. With 'chez-scheme-for-racket', that's already 
true, and there aren't bootfiles in that origin anyway. When someday we 
can actually bootstrap upstream Chez Scheme, presumably we'll add a 
snippet to delete the pre-built bootfiles from the origin, at which 
point the it will still be the same origin for both.

-Philip




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 344 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.