GNU bug report logs - #53617
28.0.90; duplicate checks in erc--switch-to-buffer

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Guy Gastineau <strings.stringsandstrings <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 00:11:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Found in version 28.0.90

Fixed in version 29.1

Done: "J.P." <jp <at> neverwas.me>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #49 received at 53617 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "J.P." <jp <at> neverwas.me>
To: Michael Olson <mwolson <at> gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-erc <at> gnu.org, bandali <at> gnu.org, 53617 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 strings.stringsandstrings <at> gmail.com, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>,
 Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#53617: 28.0.90; duplicate checks in erc--switch-to-buffer
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2022 21:35:08 -0800
Michael Olson <mwolson <at> gnu.org> writes:

> What I'd sometimes do 10+ years ago is keep an AUTHORS file with a
> list of who contributed, which files, and (in the case of unassigned
> contributors) how many lines so I knew if they were getting close to
> the limit. I'm not sure if that would map well to the Emacs repo,
> maybe a side file like ERC-AUTHORS, or just kept outside of the repo.

Hi Michael (such an honor to hear from a true ERC OG!),

In the case of an unassigned contributor (a term I'm stealing BTW
because it's vastly superior to my unpronounceable "non-paperwork
holder"), I guess we'd still have to keep tabs on contributions across
*all* of Emacs. But as a starting point for a more intensive inquiry,
it's a fine solution. And I guess we'd likely just leave that sort of
thing outside the repo, for now. Anyway, thanks so much for your
insights and for all your work back in the day! (And also to Lars for
the low down/lay of the land.)




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 63 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.