GNU bug report logs - #53617
28.0.90; duplicate checks in erc--switch-to-buffer

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Guy Gastineau <strings.stringsandstrings <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 00:11:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Found in version 28.0.90

Fixed in version 29.1

Done: "J.P." <jp <at> neverwas.me>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #34 received at 53617 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: "J.P." <jp <at> neverwas.me>
Cc: strings.stringsandstrings <at> gmail.com, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,
 emacs-erc <at> gnu.org, bandali <at> gnu.org, 53617 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#53617: 28.0.90; duplicate checks in erc--switch-to-buffer
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2022 17:00:25 +0100
"J.P." <jp <at> neverwas.me> writes:

> Apologies for the unintelligible mumblage. Somehow (believe it or not),
> I was trying to ask whether there's a system in place for keeping track
> of the number of non-trivial changes a non-paperwork holder has made so
> far. By "system" I guess I mean a person in charge of recording such
> information or perhaps a table somewhere to consult. But if it's less
> formal than all that, I suppose I'll just rely on the git history and
> whatever an author self-reports. Thanks.

No, we don't have such a system, unfortunately.  It's somewhat
subjective what counts -- we try to count "lines of code", so whitespace
changes don't count, of course, and other trivial transforms don't count
either.

So as you say -- you just have to look at the commit history and make a
judgement call in these cases.  (Or even better, ask for a copyright
assignment form and then you don't have to count. 😀)

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 63 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.