GNU bug report logs - #53504
28.0.91 `make check && make install` failing for GNU Emacs 28.0.91 ??

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 53504 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 53504 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Auntie Carol <centzon.totochtin <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 28.0.91 `make check && make install` failing for GNU Emacs 28.0.91 ??
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 13:13:18 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

I've been building from Savannah's main branch for the last couple of
months. Yesterday I decided to "roll back" to 28.0.91 and ran into the
following errors:

2 unexpected results:
   FAILED  emacs-tests/bwrap/allows-stdout
   FAILED  emacs-tests/seccomp/allows-stdout

And compilation does not complete.
All works as it should when ` check` is removed from the make directive.

kernel (supplied by Pop!_OS): 5.15.8-76051508-generic
gcc (Ubuntu 11.2.0-7ubuntu2): 11.2.0

Don't know if this is a bug or my system. Anyway, thanks!

CT

=== guts of the build script ===
export CC="gcc-10"
./autogen.sh
./configure \
--with-native-compilation  \
--with-gnutls=ifavailable \
--with-json \
--with-jpeg \
--with-pgtk \
--with-png \
--with-rsvg \
--with-tiff \
--with-wide-int \
--with-xft \
--with-xinput2 \
--with-xml2 \
--with-xpm
make check && sudo make install

=== cat ./test/src/emacs-tests.log ===
cat ./test/src/emacs-tests.log
Running 7 tests (2022-01-23 14:59:43+0000, selector ‘(not (or (tag
:expensive-test) (tag :unstable) (tag :nativecomp)))’)
Test emacs-tests/bwrap/allows-stdout backtrace:
  signal(ert-test-failed (((should (eql status 0)) :form (eql 159 0) :
  ert-fail(((should (eql status 0)) :form (eql 159 0) :value nil))
  #f(compiled-function () #<bytecode 0x91b1991a23835a9>)()
  ert--run-test-internal(#s(ert--test-execution-info :test #s(ert-test
  ert-run-test(#s(ert-test :name emacs-tests/bwrap/allows-stdout :docu
  ert-run-or-rerun-test(#s(ert--stats :selector (not (or (tag :expensi
  ert-run-tests((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :unstable) (tag :n
  ert-run-tests-batch((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :unstable) (
  ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :un
  eval((ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit '(not (or (tag :expensive-test) (
  command-line-1(("-L" ":." "-l" "ert" "-l" "src/emacs-tests" "--eval"
  command-line()
  normal-top-level()
Test emacs-tests/bwrap/allows-stdout condition:
    Info: Process output:
    (ert-test-failed
     ((should
       (eql status 0))
      :form
      (eql 159 0)
      :value nil))
   FAILED  1/7  emacs-tests/bwrap/allows-stdout (0.227544 sec)
   passed  2/7  emacs-tests/seccomp/absent-file (0.044747 sec)
Test emacs-tests/seccomp/allows-stdout backtrace:
  signal(ert-test-failed (((should (eql status 0)) :form (eql "Bad sys
  ert-fail(((should (eql status 0)) :form (eql "Bad system call" 0) :v
  #f(compiled-function () #<bytecode 0x1354e77c9d8677f7>)()
  ert--run-test-internal(#s(ert--test-execution-info :test #s(ert-test
  ert-run-test(#s(ert-test :name emacs-tests/seccomp/allows-stdout :do
  ert-run-or-rerun-test(#s(ert--stats :selector (not (or ... ... ...))
  ert-run-tests((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :unstable) (tag :n
  ert-run-tests-batch((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :unstable) (
  ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit((not (or (tag :expensive-test) (tag :un
  eval((ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit '(not (or (tag :expensive-test) (
  command-line-1(("-L" ":." "-l" "ert" "-l" "src/emacs-tests" "--eval"
  command-line()
  normal-top-level()
Test emacs-tests/seccomp/allows-stdout condition:
    Info: Process output:
    (ert-test-failed
     ((should
       (eql status 0))
      :form
      (eql "Bad system call" 0)
      :value nil))
   FAILED  3/7  emacs-tests/seccomp/allows-stdout (0.277550 sec)
   passed  4/7  emacs-tests/seccomp/empty-file (0.040075 sec)
   passed  5/7  emacs-tests/seccomp/file-too-large (0.124284 sec)
   passed  6/7  emacs-tests/seccomp/forbids-subprocess (0.307874 sec)
   passed  7/7  emacs-tests/seccomp/invalid-file-size (0.049196 sec)
Ran 7 tests, 5 results as expected, 2 unexpected (2022-01-23 14:59:45+0000,
1.329448 sec)
2 unexpected results:
   FAILED  emacs-tests/bwrap/allows-stdout
   FAILED  emacs-tests/seccomp/allows-stdout

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #8 received at 53504 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Auntie Carol <centzon.totochtin <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 53504 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#53504: 28.0.91 `make check && make install` failing for GNU
 Emacs 28.0.91 ??
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 16:45:01 +0100

Auntie Carol <centzon.totochtin <at> gmail.com> writes:

> I've been building from Savannah's main branch for the last couple of months.
> Yesterday I decided to "roll back" to 28.0.91 and ran into the following errors:
>
> 2 unexpected results:
>    FAILED  emacs-tests/bwrap/allows-stdout
>    FAILED  emacs-tests/seccomp/allows-stdout
>
> And compilation does not complete.
> All works as it should when ` check` is removed from the make directive.

There have been seccomp fixes in the emacs-28 branch earlier today --
can you try to update and rebuild Emacs and check whether the problem is
still present?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Message #13 received at 53504 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Auntie Carol <centzon.totochtin <at> gmail.com>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: 53504 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#53504: 28.0.91 `make check && make install` failing for GNU
 Emacs 28.0.91 ??
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 18:19:32 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 3:45 PM Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> wrote:

> Auntie Carol <centzon.totochtin <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I've been building from Savannah's main branch for the last couple of
> months.
> > Yesterday I decided to "roll back" to 28.0.91 and ran into the following
> errors:
> >
> > 2 unexpected results:
> >    FAILED  emacs-tests/bwrap/allows-stdout
> >    FAILED  emacs-tests/seccomp/allows-stdout
> >
> > And compilation does not complete.
> > All works as it should when ` check` is removed from the make directive.
>
> There have been seccomp fixes in the emacs-28 branch earlier today --
> can you try to update and rebuild Emacs and check whether the problem is
> still present?
>
> There is still a failure to compile. albeit with different errors now:


 ~/src/emacs on  HEAD (d193801)

== >>

GEN      src/xml-tests.log
make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/yearluk/src/emacs/test'
make[2]: [Makefile:335: check-doit] Error 2 (ignored)

SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
-----------------------
Files examined: 375
Ran 5608 tests, 5466 results as expected, 33 unexpected, 109 skipped
10 files contained unexpected results:
  src/emacs-tests.log
  lisp/wdired-tests.log
  lisp/simple-tests.log
  lisp/progmodes/xref-tests.log
  lisp/progmodes/project-tests.log
  lisp/gnus/mml-sec-tests.log
  lisp/files-tests.log
  lisp/cedet/semantic-utest-ia.log
  lisp/autorevert-tests.log
  lisp/net/tramp-tests.log
make[2]: *** [Makefile:336: check-doit] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/yearluk/src/emacs/test'
make[1]: *** [Makefile:305: check] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/yearluk/src/emacs/test'
make: *** [Makefile:994: check] Error 2

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #16 received at 53504 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Auntie Carol <centzon.totochtin <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 53504 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#53504: 28.0.91 `make check && make install` failing for GNU
 Emacs 28.0.91 ??
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:35:58 +0100

Auntie Carol <centzon.totochtin <at> gmail.com> writes:

>  There is still a failure to compile. albeit with different errors now:

With "failure to compile", you mean that the tests fail?

> 10 files contained unexpected results:
>   src/emacs-tests.log
>   lisp/wdired-tests.log
>   lisp/simple-tests.log
>   lisp/progmodes/xref-tests.log
>   lisp/progmodes/project-tests.log
>   lisp/gnus/mml-sec-tests.log
>   lisp/files-tests.log
>   lisp/cedet/semantic-utest-ia.log
>   lisp/autorevert-tests.log
>   lisp/net/tramp-tests.log

So you got (at least) eight new test failures in the version from today
compared to the one from yesterday?  That's very odd.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Message #19 received at 53504 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Auntie Carol <centzon.totochtin <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 53504 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#53504: 28.0.91 `make check && make install` failing for GNU
 Emacs 28.0.91 ??
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 14:54:12 +0100

Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:

> So you got (at least) eight new test failures in the version from today
> compared to the one from yesterday? 

More information was requested, but no response was given within a
month, so I'm closing this bug report.  If the problem still exists,
please respond to this email and we'll reopen the bug report.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.