GNU bug report logs - #52337
27.2; Doc string of `dired-check-process'

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Subject: bug#52337: closed (Re: bug#52337: 27.2; Doc string of
 `dired-check-process')
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2021 17:49:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#52337: 27.2; Doc string of `dired-check-process'

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 52337 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
52337: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=52337
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: 52337-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#52337: 27.2; Doc string of `dired-check-process'
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2021 19:48:22 +0200

> From: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
> Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 20:55:57 +0000
> 
> 1. Please consider filling the third sentence ("On error,...").
> 
> 2. The "Else returns nil for success." isn't too clear.  Please consider
> making it more clear that the return value is nil for success and either
> ARGUMENTS or PROGRAM for failure.
> 
> It's also not clear under what conditions, or when, ARGUMENTS is
> returned or PROGRAM is returned.  "Offending" doesn't help in that
> regard.  Is it possible for both ARGUMENTS and PROGRAM to "offend"?

Thanks, I fixed this on the emacs-28 branch.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: "bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
Subject: 27.2; Doc string of `dired-check-process'
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 20:55:57 +0000

1. Please consider filling the third sentence ("On error,...").

2. The "Else returns nil for success." isn't too clear.  Please consider
making it more clear that the return value is nil for success and either
ARGUMENTS or PROGRAM for failure.

It's also not clear under what conditions, or when, ARGUMENTS is
returned or PROGRAM is returned.  "Offending" doesn't help in that
regard.  Is it possible for both ARGUMENTS and PROGRAM to "offend"?

In GNU Emacs 27.2 (build 1, x86_64-w64-mingw32)
 of 2021-03-26 built on CIRROCUMULUS
Repository revision: deef5efafb70f4b171265b896505b92b6eef24e6
Repository branch: HEAD
Windowing system distributor 'Microsoft Corp.', version 10.0.19042
System Description: Microsoft Windows 10 Pro (v10.0.2009.19042.1348)

Recent messages:
For information about GNU Emacs and the GNU system, type C-h C-a.
Type C-x 1 to delete the help window.

Configured using:
 'configure --without-dbus --host=x86_64-w64-mingw32
 --without-compress-install 'CFLAGS=-O2 -static''

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.