GNU bug report logs -
#49311
(null?) cannot be compiled (error from (language typs types))
Previous Next
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 49311 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org
:
bug#49311
; Package
guile
.
(Thu, 01 Jul 2021 08:00:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org
.
(Thu, 01 Jul 2021 08:00:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi,
While hacking on Guix, I encountered the following backtace:
In system/base/compile.scm:
265:44 19 (_ _ _)
261:33 18 (_ _ #<directory (guix lint) 7fc93585b3c0>)
In language/cps/optimize.scm:
128:12 17 (_ _ _)
87:0 16 (optimize-higher-order-cps _ _)
In language/cps/dce.scm:
430:33 15 (eliminate-dead-code _)
114:18 14 (compute-live-code #<intmap 0-14692>)
In language/cps/intmap.scm:
519:6 13 (visit-branch #(#(#(#<cps (kfun () 0 1608 1)> #<cps (kclause (() () #f () #f) 2)> #<cps (kargs () () (continue 3 (const (guix lint))))> #<cps (kargs (arg) (1) (continue 4 (const #:fi…> …)
…) …) …)
519:6 12 (visit-branch #(#(#<cps (kargs () () (continue 6157 (call 3990)))> #<cps (kargs () () (throw throw/value+data #(wrong-type-arg "cdr" "Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting pair):…>
…) …) …)
519:6 11 (visit-branch #(#<cps (kargs (package wrapper-name) (4018 4019) (continue 6209 (const "\"bash-minimal\" should be in 'native-inputs' when '~a' is used")))> #<cps (kargs (arg) (4020)
(conti…> …) …)
In language/cps/type-checks.scm:
41:15 10 (elide-type-checks #<intmap 0-14692> 6216 #<intmap 0-14692>)
In language/cps/types.scm:
1903:6 9 (worklist-fold* #<procedure visit-cont (label typev)> _ _)
1955:11 8 (visit-cont 6218 #<intmap 6216+0-2>)
609:0 7 (_ _ _ _ _)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1685:16 6 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
1685:16 5 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
1780:13 4 (_ #<&compound-exception components: (#<&assertion-failure> #<&origin origin: #f> #<&message message: "Wrong number of arguments to ~A"> #<&irritants irritants: (#<procedure 7fc936cfc100
at la…>)
In guix/build/compile.scm:
167:6 3 (_ _ . _)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1747:15 2 (with-exception-handler #<procedure 7fc9338b44b0 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:1831:7 (exn)> _ #:unwind? _ #:unwind-for-type _)
In guix/build/compile.scm:
170:21 1 (_)
In unknown file:
0 (make-stack #t)
guix/build/compile.scm:170:21: Wrong number of arguments to #<procedure 7fc936cfc100 at language/cps/types.scm:609:0 (in succ param val)>
make[2]: *** [Makefile:6920: make-core-go] Fout 1
I've minimised it to
$ guile
GNU Guile 3.0.7
Copyright (C) 1995-2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Guile comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `,show w'.
This program is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
under certain conditions; type `,show c' for details.
Enter `,help' for help.
scheme@(guile-user)> (null?)
;;; <stdin>:1:0: warning: possibly wrong number of arguments to `null?'
While compiling expression:
Wrong number of arguments to #<procedure 7f50de023c20 at language/cps/types.scm:609:0 (in succ param val)>
scheme@(guile-user)>
Greetings,
Maxime.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org
:
bug#49311
; Package
guile
.
(Thu, 01 Jul 2021 11:46:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Maxime,
thank you for investigating!
Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be> writes:
> scheme@(guile-user)> (null?)
> ;;; <stdin>:1:0: warning: possibly wrong number of arguments to `null?'
This is a correct warning: null? requires an argument (the list to check
for emptyness). The path forward from here is to find out why null? does
not receive an argument.
Best wishes,
Arne
--
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein
ohne es zu merken
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org
:
bug#49311
; Package
guile
.
(Thu, 01 Jul 2021 11:46:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org
:
bug#49311
; Package
guile
.
(Thu, 01 Jul 2021 11:48:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 49311 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide schreef op do 01-07-2021 om 13:44 [+0200]:
> Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be> writes:
> > scheme@(guile-user)> (null?)
> > ;;; <stdin>:1:0: warning: possibly wrong number of arguments to `null?'
>
> This is a correct warning: null? requires an argument (the list to check
> for emptyness). The path forward from here is to find out why null? does
> not receive an argument.
Yes, the warning is correct. I wasn't referring to the warning, but to the compile
error.
scheme@(guile-user)> (null?)
;;; [the warning]
While compiling expression:
Wrong number of arguments to #<procedure 7fad2ea94660 at language/cps/types.scm:609:0 (in succ param val)>
^^^ this error
Greetings,
Maxime.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 348 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.