GNU bug report logs - #49160
28.0.50; [PATCH] Uninitialized inhibit_buffer_hooks

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: dick <dick.r.chiang <at> gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 19:40:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Found in version 28.0.50

Fixed in version 28.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>, contovob <at> tcd.ie
Cc: larsi <at> gnus.org, 49160 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#49160: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Uninitialized inhibit_buffer_hooks
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2023 15:20:14 +0200
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob <at> tcd.ie>,  larsi <at> gnus.org,
>   49160 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 11:25:40 -0500
> 
> >> > So I'm not sure we want this.  What is the real-life use case behind
> >> > this request?
> >> 
> >> The real-life use case is satisfying this bug report+patch from me,
> >> fixing what seems like a simple oversight, and the ensuing peace of mind
> >> that I will be grateful for, of course ;).
> >
> > Stefan, WDYT?
> 
> It makes the code simpler and fixes a bug, I'm all for it.
> I don't think it's urgent, so it's not super important whether it goes
> into `emacs-29`, OTOH.

Installing it means the buffer-list-update-hook will not run when we
generate an indirect buffer with this option.  Is that reasonable?

If you-two aren't averted by this effect, then let's install this on
the emacs-29 branch.




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 210 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.