GNU bug report logs -
#47344
guix-cookbook : (Basic setup with mafinests)
Previous Next
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 47344 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#47344
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:46:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Fulbert <fulbert <at> bluewin.ch>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
.
(Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:46:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
… with the patch this time !
Hello,
I propose those changes to (Basic setup with mafinests) as they
are more likely to produce the exptected result. Probably the
`combined` search-paths profiles were not available at the time of
writing this section ?!
Although It works well for me, I'm not 100% sure it should make it
to live guix-cookbook. Not sure either if filtering-out
$HOME/.config/guix/current is necessary.
Anyway, I thought it was worth proposing :)
Best regards,
Fulbert
[guix-cookbook.texi.patch (text/plain, attachment)]
Merged 47343 47344.
Request was from
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 23 Mar 2021 15:07:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#47344
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Tue, 23 Mar 2021 15:15:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #10 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Fulbert,
Fulbert 写道:
> … with the patch this time !
Thanks!
Every time you send a new mail to bug-guix <at> gnu.org it will create
a new bug number. In this case you accidentally created two bug
reports, [0] and [1].
No big deal, and I've merged them into one now, but make sure to
send replies to an existing thread to the correct
nnnnn <at> debbugs.gnu.org address. If you CC bug-guix@ in addition to
that, as some mail clients do by default, Debbugs will still know
what you mean.
...and since you seem to be interested in submitting patches
(yay!):
This also applies to multi-patch series: if you send 5 patches to
bug-guix@ or guix-patches@, 5 separate issues will be created. In
that case, send a single cover letter to bug-guix/guix-patches@,
wait for Debbugs to respond with the bug number, then send the
actual patches to nnnnn <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
Kind regards,
T G-R
[0]: http://issues.guix.gnu.org/47343
[1]: http://issues.guix.gnu.org/47344
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#47344
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Tue, 23 Mar 2021 15:15:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#47344
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Tue, 23 Mar 2021 18:21:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #16 received at 47344 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Le Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 04:14:07PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice a écrit :
> Hi Fulbert,
Hello Tobias, and yes… sorry for the nooby mess :) as well as my thanks
for the detailed instructions.
Best regards,
Fulbert
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 81 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.