GNU bug report logs - #46842
[PATCH] gnu: gnuradio: Updated to 3.9.0.0.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: João <jpsimas <at> gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2021 05:01:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: João Pedro Simas <jpsimas <at> gmail.com>, 46842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#46842] [PATCH] gnu: gnuradio: Updated to 3.9.0.0.
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 11:46:47 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> skribis:

> The patch LGTM but I got this one ‘qa_dtv’ test failure on x86_64:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> 222/241 Test #226: qa_cvsd_vocoder ..............................   Passed    1.18 sec
>         Start 230: qa_ulaw_vocoder
> 223/241 Test #228: qa_g723_24_vocoder ...........................   Passed    0.93 sec
>         Start 231: qa_codec2_vocoder
> 224/241 Test #218: qa_dtv .......................................***Failed    3.73 sec
> F
> ======================================================================
> FAIL: test_000 (__main__.test_dtv)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/tmp/guix-build-gnuradio-3.9.0.0.drv-0/gnuradio-3.9.0.0/gr-dtv/python/dtv/qa_dtv.py", line 171, in test_000
>     self.assertFloatTuplesAlmostEqual(out_data, expected_data, 5)
>   File "/tmp/guix-build-gnuradio-3.9.0.0.drv-0/gnuradio-3.9.0.0/gnuradio-runtime/python/gnuradio/gr_unittest.py", line 96, in assertFloatTuplesAlmostEqual
>     return all([
>   File "/tmp/guix-build-gnuradio-3.9.0.0.drv-0/gnuradio-3.9.0.0/gnuradio-runtime/python/gnuradio/gr_unittest.py", line 97, in <listcomp>
>     self.assertAlmostEqual(x, y, places, msg)
> AssertionError: -0.0002739299 != -0.0011434406 within 5 places (0.0008695107 difference)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ran 1 test in 2.559s
>
> FAILED (failures=1)
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> Does that ring a bell?

Hi,

I just tested this patch, and I don't reproduce the issue with the
qa_dtv test. Does it fail every time on your machine?
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 4 years and 140 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.