GNU bug report logs - #45893
[PATCH 0/2] DRAFT: Hint for options.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>

Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 16:38:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 45893-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#45893] [PATCH 0/2] DRAFT: Hint for options.
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 13:15:10 +0100
Hi Ludo,

On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 12:29, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> > Let merge and improve if required, IMHO.  As Arun mentioned in the
> > «improving “guix search”» thread, maybe it is worth to give a look at
> > the Guile string library.
>
> I went ahead and applied the three patches.  I took the liberty to make
> two changes:

Thanks!

> It’s really pleasant!

Cool!  However, it works for commands using 'parse-command-line' and
not 'args-fold*'.  For example, one patch of the series replace for
"guix show" and "guix search".  I would like to replace all the
args-fold* by parse-command-line, I think it makes sense.  WDYT?


> (I thought: when one types “guix clone”, should we suggest “git clone”? :-))

Hehe!  Maybe an extension could invoke Git under the hood when the
command is not found. ;-)

Cheers,
simon




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 106 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.