GNU bug report logs -
#45051
Guix pull fails: `In procedure put-string: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting open output port): #<closed: string 7f1182257850>`
Previous Next
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 45051 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#45051
; Package
guix
.
(Sat, 05 Dec 2020 08:28:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
pkill9 <pkill9 <at> runbox.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Sat, 05 Dec 2020 08:28:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Using guix commit 243512d984e1b870d3b77b2759698a64ed723fea. Also fails
with previous guix revisions.
Full output:
Computing Guix derivation for 'x86_64-linux'... /@ substituter-started
/gnu/store/9ph7spq3b72fv4scqqzwxalb8n0wc6xn-graphviz-2.42.3-doc
substitute -following redirection to
`https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/9ph7spq3b72fv4scqqzwxalb8n0wc6xn-graphviz-2.42.3-doc'...
Backtrace: In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 1736:10 4 (with-exception-handler _ _
#:unwind? _ # _) In unknown file:
3 (apply-smob/0 #<thunk 7f11836ec3c0>)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
718:2 2 (call-with-prompt _ _ #<procedure default-prompt-handle?>)
In ice-9/eval.scm:
619:8 1 (_ #(#(#<directory (guile-user) 7f1183311f00>)))
In guix/ui.scm:
1949:12 0 (run-guix-command _ . _)
guix/ui.scm:1949:12: In procedure run-guix-command:
In procedure put-string: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting
open output port): #<closed: string 7f1182257850> @ substituter-failed
/gnu/store/9ph7spq3b72fv4scqqzwxalb8n0wc6xn-graphviz-2.42.3-doc 256
fetching path
`/gnu/store/9ph7spq3b72fv4scqqzwxalb8n0wc6xn-graphviz-2.42.3-doc'
failed with exit code 1 @ substituter-started
/gnu/store/adx3hrrgjs0n55zm4i4p5kv6yj0q3bhq-guile-ssh-0.13.1-debug
substitute killing process 4025 Backtrace: 11 (primitive-load
"/gnu/store/f2ymnsn7d0jv9p8alj4mrg4dpw2fr5vn-compute-guix-derivation")
In ice-9/eval.scm: 155:9 10 (_ _) 159:9 9 (_
#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#<directory (guile-user) 7fc042336f?> ?) ?)
?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?)) In ./guix/store.scm: 2049:24 8
(run-with-store #<store-connection 256.99 7fc0406ba5f0> _
#:guile-for-build _ #:system _ #:target _) 1883:8 7 (_ _) In
./guix/gexp.scm: 258:18 6 (_ _) 1123:2 5 (_ _)
982:2 4 (_ _)
843:4 3 (_ _)
In ./guix/store.scm:
1931:12 2 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7fc0406ba5f0>)
1358:5 1 (map/accumulate-builds #<store-connection 256.99
7fc0406ba5f0> _ _) 1369:15 0 (_ #<store-connection 256.99
7fc0406ba5f0> 7fc0406ba5f0> _ _)
./guix/store.scm:1369:15: ERROR:
1. &store-protocol-error:
message: "some substitutes for the outputs of derivation
`/gnu/store/d879bxb47cnzkgsl37478aa4mmp7cjdg-graphviz-2.42.3.drv'
failed (usually happens due to networking issues); try `--fallback' to
build derivation from source " status: 1 guix pull: error: You found a
bug: the program
'/gnu/store/f2ymnsn7d0jv9p8alj4mrg4dpw2fr5vn-compute-guix-derivation'
failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version:
"4cf3734c56d669ee2d78082e5d7c4d0a58e0f800"; system: "x86_64-linux";
host version: "243512d984e1b870d3b77b2759698a64ed723fea"; pull-version:
1). Please report it by email to <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#45051
; Package
guix
.
(Sat, 05 Dec 2020 08:56:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 45051 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
with --fallback it is building. It may be the result of the substitute
server not being available, the error may need to be caught.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#45051
; Package
guix
.
(Sun, 06 Dec 2020 02:15:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 45051 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
It's actually doing this for *any* package I build, and it's not
because it can't get substitutes, as running `guix weather hello`
reports that a substitute is available, but it still does this issue
with the `hello` package.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#45051
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 11 Dec 2020 17:35:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 45051 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi pkill9,
pkill9 <pkill9 <at> runbox.com> skribis:
> Computing Guix derivation for 'x86_64-linux'... /@ substituter-started
> /gnu/store/9ph7spq3b72fv4scqqzwxalb8n0wc6xn-graphviz-2.42.3-doc
> substitute -following redirection to
Could it be that your substitute URL is <https://ci.guix.info>?
If so, could you try:
guix build inkscape --substitute-urls=https://ci.guix.gnu.org
?
It may have to do with <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/45174>.
HTH,
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#45051
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 11 Dec 2020 18:42:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 45051 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Ludovic,
> Could it be that your substitute URL is <https://ci.guix.info>?
>
> If so, could you try:
>
> guix build inkscape --substitute-urls=https://ci.guix.gnu.org
This works, thanks.
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
Request was from
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sat, 12 Dec 2020 18:33:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#45051
; Package
guix
.
(Sat, 08 Oct 2022 02:59:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #22 received at 45051 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
> Hi pkill9,
>
> pkill9 <pkill9 <at> runbox.com> skribis:
>
>> Computing Guix derivation for 'x86_64-linux'... /@ substituter-started
>> /gnu/store/9ph7spq3b72fv4scqqzwxalb8n0wc6xn-graphviz-2.42.3-doc
>> substitute -following redirection to
>
> Could it be that your substitute URL is <https://ci.guix.info>?
>
> If so, could you try:
>
> guix build inkscape --substitute-urls=https://ci.guix.gnu.org
Given this was the actual problem, what was the underlying error that
should have appeared in the error output that would have made that
clear? A TLS cert validation error?
--
Thanks,
Maxim
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 248 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.