GNU bug report logs - #44649
1.2.0rc0 tarball includes guix-daemon.cil.in

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Daniel Brooks <db48x <at> db48x.net>

Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 00:52:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 1.2.0

Done: Marius Bakke <marius <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Daniel Brooks <db48x <at> db48x.net>
Subject: bug#44649: closed (Re: bug#44649: 1.2.0rc0 tarball includes
 guix-daemon.cil.in)
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 22:28:01 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#44649: 1.2.0rc0 tarball includes guix-daemon.cil.in

which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 44649 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
44649: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=44649
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Marius Bakke <marius <at> gnu.org>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, Daniel Brooks
 <db48x <at> db48x.net>
Cc: 44649-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#44649: 1.2.0rc0 tarball includes guix-daemon.cil.in
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 23:26:54 +0100
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Daniel Brooks <db48x <at> db48x.net> skribis:
>
>> It should instead include the guix-daemon.cil file which was built from
>> it. The .in file has unsubstituted variabels in it which make it useless
>> as an SELinux policy.
>
> Yes, but running “./configure” gives you the ‘etc/guix-daemon.cil’ for
> your configuration.  What’s wrong with that?
>
> Marius: common practice is to not include instantiated templates; we
> wouldn’t use templates in the first place if contents were always the
> same.  :-)

Yes indeed; somehow I thought the bootstrapped tarball also had run
"configure" with the common options, but obviously that's incorrect.

Closing this bug, as there is no reason to special-case this one file.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Daniel Brooks <db48x <at> db48x.net>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: 1.2.0rc0 tarball includes guix-daemon.cil.in
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 16:51:16 -0800
It should instead include the guix-daemon.cil file which was built from
it. The .in file has unsubstituted variabels in it which make it useless
as an SELinux policy.



This bug report was last modified 4 years and 185 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.