GNU bug report logs -
#44494
etags.el xref-location-marker does not handle TAGS references to .el.gz files
Previous Next
Reported by: Pierre Rouleau <prouleau001 <at> gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 23:24:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: confirmed, patch
Merged with 2807
Done: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #60 received at 44494 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On 12/10/23 11:28, Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the
Swiss army knife of text editors wrote:
>> +(defun etags--ensure-file (file)
>> + "Ensure FILE can be visited.
>> +
>> +FILE should be an expanded file name.
>> +This function tries to locate FILE, possibly adding it a suffix
>> +present in `tags-compression-info-list'. If the file can't be found,
>> +signals an error.
>> +Else, returns the filename that can be visited for sure."
>> + (let ((f (locate-file file nil tags-compression-info-list)))
>> + (unless f
>> + (signal 'file-missing (list "Cannot locate file in TAGS" file)))
>> + f))
>
> The patch looks pretty good, but other parts of the code use
> check `auto-compression-mode` before using `tags-compression-info-list`,
> so we should probably do the same here.
Thank you! Yes, I should've added that check. I attach a patch that
incorporates the check.
> As other comments mention in the file, this arrangement is suboptimal
> because the search for compressed filenames should probably be moved to
> jka-compr's code (e.g. using `jka-compr-compression-info-list` rather
> than `tags-compression-info-list`).
Yes, but I opted to go with this simpler patch for a 24 year-old bug
report.
> Historical side note: jka-compr used to have the ability to do what we
> want here "transparently" (it changed things like `find-file-noselect`
> to look for compressed versions of the file, among other things).
> IIRC it was removed when it got integrated into Emacs (don't know why
> but I assumed it was too hackish/ugly/costly/brittle).
>
> We should arguably re-add this feature, tho maybe not transparent,
> i.e. let packages who need that request that feature explicitly (like
> here).
>
That's good to know, thank you. And I agree that the feature would be
good to have, but I hope that in the meantime we can go with the updated
patch.
[0001-Fix-searching-for-tags-in-compressed-files.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 218 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.