GNU bug report logs - #43503
Patch: Improvements regarding commands like find-file-other-tab.

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: ej32u <at> protonmail.com

Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 04:34:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: fixed

Fixed in version 28.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #8 received at 43503 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: ej32u <at> protonmail.com
Cc: 43503 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#43503: Patch: Improvements regarding commands like
 find-file-other-tab.
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 16:34:34 +0200
ej32u <at> protonmail.com writes:

> 1. Document existing command `ffap-other-tab'.
> 2. Create `find-file-read-only-other-tab' and `ffap-read-only-other-tab'.
> 3. Bind "\C-r" to `find-file-read-only-other-tab', like how "\C-f" is
>     bound to `find-file-other-tab'.
> 4. Document `ffap-read-only-other-tab' in misc.texi.
>
> I don't really know the Texinfo format, so I just copied the mark-up used for 
> other items.

Look OK to me.

> +(defun find-file-read-only-other-tab (filename &optional wildcards)
> +  "Edit file FILENAME, in another tab, but don't allow changes.
> +Like \\[find-file-other-frame] (which see), but creates a new tab.
> +
> +Like C-x t C-f, but marks buffer as read-only.
> +Use C-x C-q to permit editing."

This should probably refer to the functions, not the keystrokes?

But anyway -- I'm not really sure I understand the use case here -- is
opening files in read-only mode a thing that people do a lot?  I mean,
we have `C-x C-r', so adding tab-opening versions of that would be
logical, but...

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 241 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.