GNU bug report logs - #43381
27.1.50; Maybe wrong cursor FG color in NS port

Previous Next

Full log

Message #25 received at 43381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Dale Sedivec <dale <at> codefu.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 43381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>, alan <at> idiocy.org
Subject: Re: bug#43381: 27.1.50; Maybe wrong cursor FG color in NS port
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 17:10:30 -0500

On Sep 14, 2020, at 09:52, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
>> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 01:49:43 +0200
>> Cc: 43381 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Dale Sedivec <dale <at> codefu.org>
>> 
>> Alan Third <alan <at> idiocy.org> writes:
>> 
>>> Now you mention it, I can see that the X ports use the face colours as
>>> well...
>>> 
>>> xterm.c:1518
>>>      xgcv.background = s->f->output_data.x->cursor_pixel;
>>>      xgcv.foreground = s->face->background;
>>>           ^               ^
>> 
>> Yeah, it looks like it's been like that since at least the 90s.  So...
>> the documentation is just wrong?
> 
> Yes, the documentation is inaccurate: it describes what happens when
> the text at point uses the default face.  When the face is not the
> default, we merge that face into the cursor face, and that is what you
> see.
> 
> We should fix the documentation.

Understood.  Would it be appropriate for me to open a separate bug for the problem of the text under the box cursor being nearly unreadable, as in my example?  Maybe allowing the cursor face's :foreground to be used in preference to the background of the face at point?

Dale

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.