GNU bug report logs - #40558
Modular TexLive "Insufficient extension fonts" and duplicate fonts

Previous Next

Full log

Message #20 received at 40558 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: elaexuotee <at> wilsonb.com
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
Cc: 40558 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#40558: (no subject)
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 18:57:09 +0900

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net> wrote:
> This is a problem with the modular TeX Live packages.  The pk files are
> bitmap fonts.  I found that adding texlive-cm-super to the union helps
> in that the bitmap variants of the CM fonts will not be generated any
> more.  More font packages may be needed in the union to prevent TeX from
> falling back to bitmap fonts in other cases.
> 
> In any case, that’s unrelated to Jelle’s patch, which looks fine to me.

Thank you, Ricardo, for looking into this.

I have lost signficant amounts of hair trying to find a solution. Adding
texlive-cm-super doesn't help for the document I trying to typeset. In fact, I
even grabbed all texlive packages with fonts and threw them in the
texlive-union to no effect. No matter what, pdflatex bails when trying to find
the font to set $~$.

The only way I have gotten it to typeset under a texlive-union so far is by
munging texlive-amsfonts as Jelle mentioned.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.