GNU bug report logs - #40558
Modular TexLive "Insufficient extension fonts" and duplicate fonts

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Jelle Licht <jlicht <at> fsfe.org>

Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 16:16:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Merged with 53339

Done: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

Message #14 received at 40558 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jelle Licht <jlicht <at> fsfe.org>
To: elaexuotee <at> wilsonb.com, 40558 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#40558: (no subject)
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 14:36:55 +0200

elaexuotee <at> wilsonb.com writes:

> With the patch to texlive-amsfonts the above typesets just fine; however, metafont ends up generating cmmi10.657pk and cmr10.657pk font files. Is this expected? Typsetting it from the texlive installation of my foreign distro doesn't call out to metafont at all.

As I mentioned earlier, I am not a tex expert at all. I have no clue,
but if my patch makes spooky things happen, we should probably hold off
on applying it.

- Jelle
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 98 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.