GNU bug report logs -
#39776
Explain difference between vim and vim-full (feature request)
Previous Next
Reported by: Jack Hill <jackhill <at> jackhill.us>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 05:45:02 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Done: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 39776 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 39776 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#39776
; Package
guix
.
(Tue, 25 Feb 2020 05:45:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Jack Hill <jackhill <at> jackhill.us>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Tue, 25 Feb 2020 05:45:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Guix,
This is an enhancement request: I think we should explain what vim-full
provides over vim in the package description. What do you think?
All the best,
Jack
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#39776
; Package
guix
.
(Tue, 25 Feb 2020 15:31:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 39776 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 12:44:30AM -0500, Jack Hill wrote:
> Hi Guix,
>
> This is an enhancement request: I think we should explain what vim-full
> provides over vim in the package description. What do you think?
Absolutely! Who will write the patch? :)
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#39776
; Package
guix
.
(Tue, 25 Feb 2020 16:33:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 39776 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 12:44:30AM -0500, Jack Hill wrote:
>> Hi Guix,
>>
>> This is an enhancement request: I think we should explain what vim-full
>> provides over vim in the package description. What do you think?
>
> Absolutely! Who will write the patch? :)
I volunteer. I'll have to check what all vim-full provides first.
I did want to record the idea an the bug tracker before I forgot, and check
that others thought it was a reasonable idea. Thanks for confirming that.
All the best,
Jack
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#39776
; Package
guix
.
(Tue, 25 Feb 2020 19:17:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 39776 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
* gnu/packages/vim.scm (vim-full)[description]: New field. Explain what
vim-full provides over vim.
---
gnu/packages/vim.scm | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/vim.scm b/gnu/packages/vim.scm
index 67f245b26d..a94a677b25 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/vim.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/vim.scm
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
;;; Copyright © 2019 HiPhish <hiphish <at> posteo.de>
;;; Copyright © 2019 Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>
;;; Copyright © 2019, 2020 Jakub Kądziołka <kuba <at> kadziolka.net>
+;;; Copyright © 2020 Jack Hill <jackhill <at> jackhill.us>
;;;
;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
;;;
@@ -131,6 +132,8 @@
("tzdata" ,tzdata-for-tests)))
(home-page "https://www.vim.org/")
(synopsis "Text editor based on vi")
+ ;; The description shares language with the vim-full package. When making
+ ;; changes, check if the other description also needs to be updated.
(description
"Vim is a highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text
editing. It is an improved version of the vi editor distributed with most UNIX
@@ -254,7 +257,21 @@ with the editor vim.")))
("python-3" ,python)
("ruby" ,ruby)
("tcl" ,tcl)
- ,@(package-inputs vim)))))
+ ,@(package-inputs vim)))
+ ;; The description shares language with the vim package. When making
+ ;; changes, check if the other description also needs to be updated.
+ (description "Vim is a highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text
+editing. It is an improved version of the vi editor distributed with most UNIX
+systems.
+
+Vim is often called a \"programmer's editor,\" and so useful for programming
+that many consider it an entire IDE. It's not just for programmers, though.
+Vim is perfect for all kinds of text editing, from composing email to editing
+configuration files.
+
+This package provides a version of Vim with many optional features enabled.
+It includes a graphical interface, @command{gvim}, and support for plugins
+written in the Python 3, Perl, Ruby, Tcl, and Lua programming languages.")))
(define-public vim-neocomplete
(package
--
2.25.1
Reply sent
to
Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Wed, 26 Feb 2020 20:49:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Jack Hill <jackhill <at> jackhill.us>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Wed, 26 Feb 2020 20:49:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 39776-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Jack Hill <jackhill <at> jackhill.us> writes:
> * gnu/packages/vim.scm (vim-full)[description]: New field. Explain what
> vim-full provides over vim.
Applied, thanks!
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 26 Mar 2020 11:24:07 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 87 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.