GNU bug report logs - #39332
[PATCH] system: Add btrfs-progs to %BASE-PACKAGES.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#39332: closed ([PATCH] system: Add btrfs-progs to
 %BASE-PACKAGES.)
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2020 00:22:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Fri, 7 Feb 2020 19:21:45 -0500
with message-id <20200208002145.GE12194 <at> jasmine.lan>
and subject line Re: [bug#39332] [PATCH] system: Add btrfs-progs to %BASE-PACKAGES.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #39332,
regarding [PATCH] system: Add btrfs-progs to %BASE-PACKAGES.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
39332: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=39332
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] system: Add btrfs-progs to %BASE-PACKAGES.
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 17:26:51 -0500

* gnu/system.scm (%base-packages): Add btrfs-progs.
---
 gnu/system.scm | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gnu/system.scm b/gnu/system.scm
index 01baa248a2..7cb6bef99d 100644
--- a/gnu/system.scm
+++ b/gnu/system.scm
@@ -586,7 +586,8 @@ of PROVENANCE-SERVICE-TYPE to its services."
          ;; already depends on it anyway.
          kmod eudev
 
-         e2fsprogs kbd
+         btrfs-progs e2fsprogs
+         kbd
 
          bash-completion
 
-- 
2.25.0

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Brice Waegeneire <brice <at> waegenei.re>
Cc: 39332-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#39332] [PATCH] system: Add btrfs-progs to %BASE-PACKAGES.
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 19:21:45 -0500

On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 11:19:18AM +0000, Brice Waegeneire wrote:
> On 2020-01-28 23:14, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 11:42:16PM +0100, Jonathan Brielmaier wrote:
> > > This adds btrfs-progs, zstd and lzo to the closure with a total of
> > > 7.7MiB. So that doesn't seem to big. I'm just wondering if we need
> > > btrfs
> > > support here at all, as I would call btrfs still kind of exotic apart
> > > from *SUSE distros and Facebook's backend.
> > 
> > Yeah, maybe it is too niche. I use it on all my machines but that's just
> > me. Let's wait to see if there are more comments before deciding.
> 
> Maybe %base-packages is the wrong place to add it. But it should at least be
> added to the system profile if a file-systems entry uses btrfs which isn't
> the case as I recall.

You're right, that's a much better idea!

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.