GNU bug report logs - #38818
Dired: mention deleting buffers, not just windows

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>

Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 16:45:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: notabug

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #77 received at 38818 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Pieter van Oostrum <pieter-l <at> vanoostrum.org>
To: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
Cc: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>, 38818 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#38818: Dired: mention deleting buffers, not just windows
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2020 00:51:03 +0100
積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org> writes:

>>>>>> "PvO" == Pieter van Oostrum <pieter-l <at> vanoostrum.org> writes:
> PvO> Well, this is how I do it.
>
> PvO> (defun my-dired-load-hook-fun ()
> PvO>        (require 'dired-x)
> PvO>        (define-key dired-mode-map "q" #'kill-current-buffer))
>
> PvO> (add-hook 'dired-load-hook 'my-dired-load-hook-fun)
>
> OK, but this does not seem environmentally friendly, leaving a function
> (that I hereby promise not to use a second time,) lying around.
>
> Well I guess I could undefun it... But one never can find out how (Bug!:
> (info "(eintr) Change a defun") etc. Info pages never say how!)
> Plus seems a little bulky to do a defun ... undefun each time in a
> .emacs file.

Your version does that too, if the defun semantics would be what you expected. It leaves exactly the same function in the name space. If you don't want that then use the lambda form. But you said your version was better. Why then if you want the function to be anonymous?
-- 
Pieter van Oostrum
www: http://pieter.vanoostrum.org/
PGP key: [8DAE142BE17999C4]




This bug report was last modified 5 years and 122 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.