GNU bug report logs - #38818
Dired: mention deleting buffers, not just windows

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>

Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 16:45:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: notabug

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #152 received at 38818 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> linux-m68k.org>
Cc: pieter-l <at> vanoostrum.org, rms <at> gnu.org, michael_heerdegen <at> web.de,
 38818 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, larsi <at> gnus.org,
 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
Subject: Re: bug#38818: jidanni's mail headers not perfect?!
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 12:02:32 +0200
On January 6, 2020 11:23:13 AM GMT+02:00, Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Jan 06 2020, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > On January 6, 2020 10:30:55 AM GMT+02:00, Andreas Schwab
> <schwab <at> linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> >> On Jan 05 2020, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> 
> >> >> From: =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan Jacobson
> <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
> >> >>       ^^^^^^^^^^^
> >> >
> >> > Why do you think this arrives intact to people's MUA?
> >> 
> >> Why do you think this does not arrive intact to people's MUA?
> >
> > Because some methods of fetching email auto-convert qp-encoded and
> base64 encoded parts.
> 
> But that isn't the fault of the raw mail contents.


This isn't about assigning blame, this is about finding where that mojibake comes from and what triggers it, and hopefully figuring out how to avoid or fix that.




This bug report was last modified 5 years and 122 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.