GNU bug report logs - #38267
upgrade brlaser

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Nicolò Balzarotti <anothersms <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#38267: closed (Re: [bug#38267] upgrade brlaser)
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 21:06:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#38267: upgrade brlaser

which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 38267 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
38267: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=38267
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
To: Nicolò Balzarotti <anothersms <at> gmail.com>,
 38267-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#38267] upgrade brlaser
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 22:05:09 +0100

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

Nicolò Balzarotti <anothersms <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Hi, yesterday I notified brlaser maintainer that a package is available on
> guix and he asked us to upgrade (https://github.com/pdewacht/brlaser/pull/55),
> so here's the patch.

Nice, applied (with a conventional commit message), thank you!

I will happily accept a follow-up patch that removes all the printer
product names with something like "known to work with a wide array of
Brother printers, consult @url{foo,https://bar} for the full list".

WDYT?  :-)

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Nicolò Balzarotti <anothersms <at> gmail.com>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: upgrade brlaser
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 11:06:07 +0100

[Message part 6 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi, yesterday I notified brlaser maintainer that a package is available on
guix and he asked us to upgrade (https://github.com/pdewacht/brlaser/pull/55),
so here's the patch.

I moved from using the commit # to the released version.
Since the let block was not needed anymore, the patch is unnecessary ugly,
let me know if I need to format it differently

Thanks, Nicolò

[Message part 7 (text/html, inline)]

[0001-gnu-packages-printers.scm-brlaser-Update-to-v6.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.