GNU bug report logs -
#3801
23.0.96; Emacs manual: add index entry for "notation, keys" or "key notation"
Previous Next
Reported by: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 21:25:04 UTC
Severity: minor
Tags: notabug
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 3801 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 3801 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
:
bug#3801
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:25:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
"Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
.
(Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:25:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):
I tried looking for the place in the Emacs manual where the notation
for key sequences (the one used in the doc) is described. I tried
`notation' and found there was only one match:
`gdb-use-colon-colon-notation'. Users should be able to find this by
looking for terms such as `notation' and `conventions'.
In GNU Emacs 23.0.96.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
of 2009-07-09 on SOFT-MJASON
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
configured using `configure --with-gcc (3.4)'
Severity set to 'minor' from 'normal'
Request was from
Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
to
control <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
.
(Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:10:13 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#3801
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:29:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #10 received at 3801 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
"Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com> writes:
> I tried looking for the place in the Emacs manual where the notation
> for key sequences (the one used in the doc) is described. I tried
> `notation' and found there was only one match:
> `gdb-use-colon-colon-notation'. Users should be able to find this by
> looking for terms such as `notation' and `conventions'.
In what circumstances does Emacs talk about notations for key sequences?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#3801
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 12 Jul 2011 16:29:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #13 received at 3801 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> > I tried looking for the place in the Emacs manual where the notation
> > for key sequences (the one used in the doc) is described. I tried
> > `notation' and found there was only one match:
> > `gdb-use-colon-colon-notation'. Users should be able to find this by
> > looking for terms such as `notation' and `conventions'.
>
> In what circumstances does Emacs talk about notations for key
> sequences?
The conventions used in the doc should be described. They are, for the Elisp
manual: see node `Conventions' and its subnodes. See how detailed those nodes
are, and how well they explain the notations used in the Elisp manual.
The Emacs manual should also describe the notations it uses. In particular,
key-sequence notation.
There should be a description of how the manual indicates key sequences,
including for different kinds of keys (e.g. angle-bracket notation vs no angle
brackets).
If there is not yet such a desciption, it should be added. And then it should
be indexed (this bug report).
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#3801
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 12 Jul 2011 17:50:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #16 received at 3801 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 09:27:55 -0700
> Cc: 3801 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>
> There should be a description of how the manual indicates key sequences,
> including for different kinds of keys (e.g. angle-bracket notation vs no angle
> brackets).
I think you are looking for "User Input" and "Keys" nodes.
Added tag(s) notabug.
Request was from
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 12 Jul 2011 19:36:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug closed, send any further explanations to
3801 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Request was from
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 12 Jul 2011 19:36:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#3801
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 12 Jul 2011 19:36:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #23 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> I think you are looking for "User Input" and "Keys" nodes.
Yes, I can't remember "notation" as a word people use for keys.
Closing this bug report.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#3801
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 12 Jul 2011 20:26:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #26 received at 3801 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> > I think you are looking for "User Input" and "Keys" nodes.
>
> Yes, I can't remember "notation" as a word people use for keys.
>
> Closing this bug report.
It's not about anyone using "notation" as a word for keys.
It's about being able to easily locate the notational conventions we use in our
manuals.
As I said, contrast the case of the Elisp manual.
In the Elisp manual too we should probably add "notational conventions" as an
index entry, in addition to the existing entry "typographical conventions"
(which takes you to node `Some Terms', a subnode of node `Conventions').
But in that manual (Elisp) things are much clearer because of this top-level
table of contents entry:
`Conventions' - How the manual is formatted
There is no similar organization for the Emacs manual, and consequently it is
more difficult to find a presentation of "how the manual is formatted".
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#3801
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 12 Jul 2011 20:26:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #29 received at 3801 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> > There should be a description of how the manual indicates
> > key sequences, including for different kinds of keys (e.g.
> > angle-bracket notation vs no angle brackets).
>
> I think you are looking for "User Input" and "Keys" nodes.
Yes and no. Yes, those nodes speak about keys, and they _use_ the notational
conventions defined for the manual.
But no, those nodes do not _present_ (introduce, describe, explain) the
notational conventions that are used.
I don't see any place in the Emacs manual where we introduce the notational
conventions used. Contrast that with the Elisp manual, where we go into quite a
bit of detail about the notation used in the manual.
Did not alter fixed versions and reopened.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 12 Jul 2011 20:27:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#3801
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 12 Jul 2011 20:33:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #34 received at 3801 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
> Cc: <bugs <at> gnus.org>, <3801 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:25:10 -0700
>
> I don't see any place in the Emacs manual where we introduce the notational
> conventions used.
Right. It doesn't do that.
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#3801
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:17:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #37 received at 3801 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> > I don't see any place in the Emacs manual where we
> > introduce the notational conventions used.
>
> Right. It doesn't do that.
Glad we agree. That's the bug. Please introduce the conventions and then index
that doc.
Reply sent
to
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Wed, 13 Jul 2011 02:53:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
"Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Wed, 13 Jul 2011 02:53:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #42 received at 3801-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
> Cc: <bugs <at> gnus.org>, <3801 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:16:23 -0700
>
> > > I don't see any place in the Emacs manual where we
> > > introduce the notational conventions used.
> >
> > Right. It doesn't do that.
>
> Glad we agree. That's the bug.
Not necessarily. It's marked "notabug".
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 10 Aug 2011 11:24:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 13 years and 318 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.