GNU bug report logs -
#37924
[PATCH] gnu: Fix make-gcc-libc
Previous Next
Reported by: Carl Dong <contact <at> carldong.me>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:41:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report
#37924: [PATCH] gnu: Fix make-gcc-libc
which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed.
The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 37924 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
--
37924: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=37924
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Carl Dong <contact <at> carldong.me> skribis:
> Until now the following wouldn't build:
>
> (use-modules (gnu packages commencement)
> (gnu packages gcc)
> (gnu packages base))
>
> (make-gcc-libc gcc-9 glibc-2.27)
>
> * gnu/packages/base.scm (make-gcc-libc)[phases]: Add environment
> variables to place the target libc on the system header search path.
> [make-flags]: Remove unncessary FLAGS_FOR_TARGET.
> [native-inputs]: Construct in a way that doesn't require emptying
> inputs.
> ---
> gnu/packages/base.scm | 27 ++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
This was pushed as 2b1d708294f0aced5c991baed146e0ae4e7d63dd, closing!
Ludo’.
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Reviewers, would like some insight into whether it's okay to remove the
FLAGS_FOR_TARGET. From what I can tell it comes from CROSS-GCC-ARGUMENTS in (gnu
packages cross-base) which might not be needed here since we're not
cross-building. I've tested this toolchain built without FLAGS_FOR_TARGET and it
_seems_ to work fine.
-----
Until now the following wouldn't build:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(use-modules (gnu packages commencement)
(gnu packages gcc)
(gnu packages base))
(make-gcc-libc gcc-9 glibc-2.27)
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
* gnu/packages/base.scm (make-gcc-libc)[phases]: Add environment
variables to place the target libc on the system header search path.
[make-flags]: Remove unncessary FLAGS_FOR_TARGET.
[native-inputs]: Construct in a way that doesn't require emptying
inputs.
---
gnu/packages/base.scm | 27 ++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/base.scm b/gnu/packages/base.scm
index 4e80a2fadb..3a3360dc7a 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/base.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/base.scm
@@ -981,18 +981,23 @@ with the Linux kernel.")
(substitute-keyword-arguments
(ensure-keyword-arguments (package-arguments base-gcc)
'(#:implicit-inputs? #f))
- ((#:make-flags flags)
- `(let ((libc (assoc-ref %build-inputs "libc")))
- ;; FLAGS_FOR_TARGET are needed for the target libraries to receive
- ;; the -Bxxx for the startfiles.
- (cons (string-append "FLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-B" libc "/lib")
- ,flags)))))
+ ((#:phases phases)
+ `(modify-phases ,phases
+ (add-before 'configure 'treat-glibc-as-system-header
+ (lambda _
+ (let ((libc (assoc-ref %build-inputs "libc")))
+ ;; GCCs build processes requires that the libc
+ ;; we're building against is on the system header
+ ;; search path.
+ (for-each (lambda (var)
+ (setenv var (string-append libc "/include")))
+ '("C_INCLUDE_PATH" "CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH"))
+ #t)))))))
(native-inputs
- `(("libc" ,libc)
- ("libc:static" ,libc "static")
- ,@(append (package-inputs base-gcc)
- (fold alist-delete (%final-inputs) '("libc" "libc:static")))))
- (inputs '())))
+ `(,@(package-native-inputs base-gcc)
+ ,@(append (fold alist-delete (%final-inputs) '("libc" "libc:static")))
+ ("libc" ,libc)
+ ("libc:static" ,libc "static")))))
(define-public (make-glibc-locales glibc)
(package
--
2.23.0
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 245 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.