GNU bug report logs - #37825
[PATCH] gnu: bitcoin-abc: Update to 0.20.4.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>

Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2019 18:50:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #10 received at 37825-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
To: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>, 37825-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
Subject: Re: [bug#37825] [PATCH] gnu: bitcoin-abc: Update to 0.20.4.
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 00:23:45 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net> writes:

> * gnu/packages/finance.scm (bitcoin-abc): Update to 0.20.4.
>   [source]: Fix uri.
>   [inputs]: Use bdb-5.3 (bdb-4.8 is not supported).
>   [arguments]: Add 'fix-tests' phase.

[...]

> +    (arguments
> +     (substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments bitcoin-core)
> +       ((#:phases phases)
> +        `(modify-phases ,phases
> +           (add-after 'unpack 'fix-tests
> +             ;; Disable 'check-devtools' test which tries to run a
> +             ;; python script that doesn't exist.
> +             (lambda _
> +               (substitute* "Makefile.in"
> +                 (("^check-local: check-devtools")
> +                  "check-local:"))
> +               #t))))))

Do you know why this script is not distributed?  Should we provide it,
or was it a packaging mistake upstream?

In any case I pushed this patch in
28d46d9d4317180b348ad5baeddad8ef25ed430a.  Thank you!
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 5 years and 203 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.