GNU bug report logs -
#37825
[PATCH] gnu: bitcoin-abc: Update to 0.20.4.
Previous Next
Reported by: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2019 18:50:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 37825 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 37825 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#37825
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sat, 19 Oct 2019 18:50:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
.
(Sat, 19 Oct 2019 18:50:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
* gnu/packages/finance.scm (bitcoin-abc): Update to 0.20.4.
[source]: Fix uri.
[inputs]: Use bdb-5.3 (bdb-4.8 is not supported).
[arguments]: Add 'fix-tests' phase.
---
gnu/packages/finance.scm | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/finance.scm b/gnu/packages/finance.scm
index 960e3adeb3..0ab6489aeb 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/finance.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/finance.scm
@@ -1133,15 +1133,35 @@ Trezor wallet.")
(package
(inherit bitcoin-core)
(name "bitcoin-abc")
- (version "0.19.8")
+ (version "0.20.4")
(source (origin
(method url-fetch)
(uri (string-append "https://download.bitcoinabc.org/"
- version "/linux/src/bitcoin-abc-"
+ version "/src/bitcoin-abc-"
version ".tar.gz"))
(sha256
(base32
- "0ndvkxv5m8346bdhfqzgdiz1k9wyjycj05jp7daf9pml3cw79sz5"))))
+ "0fld54z3l7z7k5n35rrjichjnx37j9xp0rv8i69m3x4qfj1xk2np"))))
+ (inputs
+ `(("bdb" ,bdb-5.3)
+ ("boost" ,boost)
+ ("libevent" ,libevent)
+ ("miniupnpc" ,miniupnpc)
+ ("openssl" ,openssl)
+ ("protobuf" ,protobuf)
+ ("qtbase" ,qtbase)))
+ (arguments
+ (substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments bitcoin-core)
+ ((#:phases phases)
+ `(modify-phases ,phases
+ (add-after 'unpack 'fix-tests
+ ;; Disable 'check-devtools' test which tries to run a
+ ;; python script that doesn't exist.
+ (lambda _
+ (substitute* "Makefile.in"
+ (("^check-local: check-devtools")
+ "check-local:"))
+ #t))))))
(home-page "https://www.bitcoinabc.org/")
(synopsis "Bitcoin ABC peer-to-peer full node for the Bitcoin Cash protocol")
(description
--
2.23.0
Reply sent
to
Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Thu, 31 Oct 2019 23:24:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Thu, 31 Oct 2019 23:24:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #10 received at 37825-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net> writes:
> * gnu/packages/finance.scm (bitcoin-abc): Update to 0.20.4.
> [source]: Fix uri.
> [inputs]: Use bdb-5.3 (bdb-4.8 is not supported).
> [arguments]: Add 'fix-tests' phase.
[...]
> + (arguments
> + (substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments bitcoin-core)
> + ((#:phases phases)
> + `(modify-phases ,phases
> + (add-after 'unpack 'fix-tests
> + ;; Disable 'check-devtools' test which tries to run a
> + ;; python script that doesn't exist.
> + (lambda _
> + (substitute* "Makefile.in"
> + (("^check-local: check-devtools")
> + "check-local:"))
> + #t))))))
Do you know why this script is not distributed? Should we provide it,
or was it a packaging mistake upstream?
In any case I pushed this patch in
28d46d9d4317180b348ad5baeddad8ef25ed430a. Thank you!
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#37825
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Fri, 01 Nov 2019 10:19:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #13 received at 37825 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Marius Bakke skribis:
> Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net> writes:
>
>> * gnu/packages/finance.scm (bitcoin-abc): Update to 0.20.4.
>> [source]: Fix uri.
>> [inputs]: Use bdb-5.3 (bdb-4.8 is not supported).
>> [arguments]: Add 'fix-tests' phase.
>
> [...]
>
>> + (arguments
>> + (substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments bitcoin-core)
>> + ((#:phases phases)
>> + `(modify-phases ,phases
>> + (add-after 'unpack 'fix-tests
>> + ;; Disable 'check-devtools' test which tries to run a
>> + ;; python script that doesn't exist.
>> + (lambda _
>> + (substitute* "Makefile.in"
>> + (("^check-local: check-devtools")
>> + "check-local:"))
>> + #t))))))
>
> Do you know why this script is not distributed? Should we provide it,
> or was it a packaging mistake upstream?
>
> In any case I pushed this patch in
> 28d46d9d4317180b348ad5baeddad8ef25ed430a. Thank you!
I'm not sure if it's a packaging mistake or a makefile mistake (if these
tests are not supposed to be run on a release version). They are tests
to check that some development tools work correctly (e.g. tools to
generate a header file which is included in the release tarball, to
update the copyright years in the headers, etc).
Information forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#37825
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Sun, 03 Nov 2019 17:12:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #16 received at 37825 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net> writes:
> Marius Bakke skribis:
>
>> Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net> writes:
>>
>>> * gnu/packages/finance.scm (bitcoin-abc): Update to 0.20.4.
>>> [source]: Fix uri.
>>> [inputs]: Use bdb-5.3 (bdb-4.8 is not supported).
>>> [arguments]: Add 'fix-tests' phase.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> + (arguments
>>> + (substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments bitcoin-core)
>>> + ((#:phases phases)
>>> + `(modify-phases ,phases
>>> + (add-after 'unpack 'fix-tests
>>> + ;; Disable 'check-devtools' test which tries to run a
>>> + ;; python script that doesn't exist.
>>> + (lambda _
>>> + (substitute* "Makefile.in"
>>> + (("^check-local: check-devtools")
>>> + "check-local:"))
>>> + #t))))))
>>
>> Do you know why this script is not distributed? Should we provide it,
>> or was it a packaging mistake upstream?
>>
>> In any case I pushed this patch in
>> 28d46d9d4317180b348ad5baeddad8ef25ed430a. Thank you!
>
> I'm not sure if it's a packaging mistake or a makefile mistake (if these
> tests are not supposed to be run on a release version). They are tests
> to check that some development tools work correctly (e.g. tools to
> generate a header file which is included in the release tarball, to
> update the copyright years in the headers, etc).
I see, thanks for the explanation. Perhaps we are simply using the
wrong Makefile target? By default gnu-build-system runs 'make check' in
the 'check' phase: some packages use 'make test' or 'make ci' instead.
Something to look out for in the next version. :-)
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Mon, 02 Dec 2019 12:24:06 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 202 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.