GNU bug report logs - #3717
M-x man completion

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: jidanni <at> jidanni.org

Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:55:04 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Merged with 4056

Found in version 1:20100118-1

Done: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #227 received at 3717 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Kevin Ryde <user42 <at> zip.com.au>
Cc: 3717 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#3717: M-x man completion
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:53:20 -0500
> Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>> "boundary"

> Speaking of boundaries, I wonder if perl "::" would be a good boundary,
> since it's basically a directory separator in disguise.  I'll give it a
> go - though I'm not a sophisticated completions user, so I wonder if
> I'll notice the difference :).

>     (cond ((eq (car-safe action) 'boundaries) ;; emacs23
>            (let* ((suffix (cdr action))
>                   ;; after last "::", or after start of string
>                   ;; (page names don't have newlines, so ".*" is ok)
>                   (start  (if (string-match ".*::" str) (match-end 0) 0))
>                   ;; first "::", or end of string
>                   (end    (string-match "::\\|\\'" suffix)))
>              (cons 'boundaries (cons start end))))

The `completion-boundaries' info is really a meta-information about what
`all-completions' returns.  So it doesn't make sense to only change
`bundaries' without changing the `all-completions' behavior accodingly.

This said: adding ":" to completion-pcm-word-delimiters would be easier
and would work probably as well if not better,


        Stefan




This bug report was last modified 15 years and 108 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.